The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Creative abilities in the arts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Specifically, DT fosters creativity by blending analytical and imaginative thinking processes.”
From A meta-analysis to explore the role of design thinking in enhancing creativity as learning outcomes in STEM education (2026) · cites this paper as Guilford, 1957
Citations
Cites
Guilford, J. P. (1956) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040755 · Cited by 1,677
Self-citationFactors in artistic aptitude: Final summary of a ten-year study of a special ability.
Meier, N. C. (1939) · The Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093484 · Cited by 48
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique.
Amabile, T. M. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997 · Cited by 2,278
Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.002 · Cited by 638
Development and Psychometric Integrity of a Measure of Ideational Behavior
Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1334_16 · Cited by 453
Lee, C. S., & Therriault, D. J. (2013) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.008 · Cited by 402
The person, the product, and the response: conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity1
Jackson, P. W., & Messick, S. (1965) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1965.tb01389.x · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Guilford, J. P.
- Corresponding author
- Guilford, J. P.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1957
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 110-118
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2042700456
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
- Keywords
- creativity, art, artistic talent
- MeSH terms
- Art, Creativity, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
