Reaction time as a function of foreperiod duration and variability.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In variable FP paradigms, sequential effects occur such that longer FPs on the preceding trial produce slower RTs on the current trial, particularly for the shortest current FPs.
“Moreover, in such paradigms, RTs increase as a function of the preceding FP (i.e., sequential effects).”
From Role of the Prefrontal Cortex in the Foreperiod Effect: TMS Evidence for Dual Mechanisms in Temporal Preparation (2006) · cites this paper as Karlin 1959
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The more or less startling effects of weak prestimulation
Graham, F. K. (1975) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb01284.x · Cited by 1,119 · see citing works
Vallesi, A., Shallice, T., & Walsh, V. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj163 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Interaction of raclopride and preparatory interval effects on simple reaction time performance
MacDonald, C. J., & Meck, W. H. (2006) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2006.08.004 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- Karlin, L.
- Corresponding author
- Karlin, Lawrence
- Venue
- Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Published
- 1959
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185-191
- ISSN
- 0022-1015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043151632
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- reaction time
- MeSH terms
- Learning, Reaction Time
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
