The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Instructional technology and the measurement of learing outcomes: Some questions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
E-Learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification
Klašnja-Milićević, A., Vesin, B., Ivanović, M., & Budimac, Z. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.001 · Cited by 580
Learning factories for future oriented research and education in manufacturing
Abele, E., Chryssolouris, G., Sihn, W., Metternich, J., ElMaraghy, H., Seliger, G., Sivard, G., ElMaraghy, W., Hummel, V., Tisch, M., et al. (2017) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.005 · Cited by 355
GLASS, G. V. (1978) · Journal of Educational Measurement · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1978.tb00072.x · Cited by 309
Digital competence in the Norwegian teacher education and schools
Krumsvik, R. J. (2011) · Högre utbildning · doi:10.23865/hu.v1.874 · Cited by 297
How to Construct Achievement Tests to Assess Comprehension
Anderson, R. C. (1972) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170014 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Glaser, R.
- Venue
- American Psychologist
- Published
- 1963
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 519-521
- ISSN
- 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150323054
- Cited by
- 607
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 85.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Instructional technology and the measurement of learing outcomes: Some questions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0049294
- The paper
- Glaser, R. (1963). Instructional technology and the measurement of learing outcomes: Some questions. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0049294
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
