The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Krosnick, J. A. (1999) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.537 · Cited by 1,852
Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress?
Greenwald, A. G., Pratkanis, A. R., Leippe, M. R., & Baumgardner, M. H. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.93.2.216 · Cited by 574
Social Attitudes and Other Acquired Behavioral Dispositions.
Campbell, D. T. (1963) · Psychology: A study of a science. Study II. Empirical substructure and relations with other sciences. Volume 6. Investigations of man as socius: Their place in psychology and the social sciences. · doi:10.1037/10590-003 · Cited by 514
Self-citationHinds, P. J. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.5.2.205 · Cited by 397
The relation of cognitive and memorial processes to persuasion in a simulated jury trial
Calder, B. J., Insko, C. A., & Yandell, B. (1974) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1974.tb02808.x · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, N., & Campbell, D. T.
- Venue
- The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1959-07
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 0096-851X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073696672
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0049330
- The paper
- Miller, N., & Campbell, D. T. (1959). Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurements. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0049330
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
