Cited by 25Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsPsychological Testing and Assessment

The effect of shock on recognition thresholds

Reece, Michael M.·1954·The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0061018

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimental evidence suggests that blunting of aversive uncontrollable stimuli operates on early levels of processing; e.g., threshold for cues preceding painful stimulation is elevated when no avoidance or escape is possible.

    “Experimental evidence suggests that the blunting of aversive uncontrollable stimuli operates already on early levels of processing; for example, the threshold for cues preceding painful stimulation seems elevated when there are no possibilities of avoidance or escape (e.g., Reece, 1954).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reece, M. M.
Corresponding author
Reece, Michael M.
Venue
The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
Published
1954-04
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
165-172
ISSN
0096-851X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094028936
Cited by
25
References
8
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
shock, recognition threshold, sensory discrimination, sensory adaptation
MeSH terms
Humans, Learning, Perception, Shock

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review