Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 445

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Word recognition as a function of retinal locus.

Open access
Mishkin, Mortimer, Forgays, Donald G.·1952·Journal of Experimental Psychology

Abstract

No contemporary psychologist would deny that the problems of learning and perception are intimately related. But how they are related and the degree to which they are interdependent has never been considered systematically. Hilgard (6, p. 181) has pointed to what is in all probability the major stumbling block. Leading theorists have been too long preoccupied with either one or the other of the two fields of investigation, and it can be fairly said that they have neglected the relationship between them. Kohler (9, p. 192), for example, would have us believe that if past experience does exert an influence upon perceptual organization, “it must be restricted to particular situations”. Furthermore, those who believe otherwise “will have to support their theory by experiments of their own”. Certainly the evidence gathered in support of the Gestalt view (8), (10), (18) is voluminous and persuasive.[...]

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0061361

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 445

Metadata

Authors
Mishkin, M., & Forgays, D. G.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
1952
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
43-48
ISSN
0022-1015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987875906
Cited by
445
References
1
FWCI
5.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.