Cited by 9,825Memory and Neural MechanismsNeurology and Historical StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The Organization of Behavior

Hebb, D.O.·2005·Psychology Press eBooks

Abstract

Since its publication in 1949, D.O. Hebb's, The Organization of Behavior has been one of the most influential books in the fields of psychology and neuroscience. However, the original edition has been unavailable since 1966, ensuring that Hebb's comment that a classic normally means "cited but not read" is true in his case. This new edition rectifies a long-standing problem for behavioral neuroscientists--the inability to obtain one of the most cited publications in the field. The Organization of Behavior played a significant part in stimulating the investigation of the neural foundations of behavior and continues to be inspiring because it provides a general framework for relating behavior to synaptic organization through the dynamics of neural networks. D.O. Hebb was also the first to examine the mechanisms by which environment and experience can influence brain structure and function, and his ideas formed the basis for work on enriched environments as stimulants for behavioral development. References to Hebb, the Hebbian cell assembly, the Hebb synapse, and the Hebb rule increase each year. These forceful ideas of 1949 are now applied in engineering, robotics, and computer science, as well as neurophysiology, neuroscience, and psychology--a tribute to Hebb's foresight in developing a foundational neuropsychological theory of the organization of behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781410612403

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experiences that are repeatedly co-activated gradually develop stronger associations (Hebbian learning).

    “In biological systems, experiences that are repeatedly co-activated gradually develop stronger associations, a phenomenon often summarized as 'neurons that fire together wire together' (illustrated in Figure 2).”

    From HeLa-Mem: Hebbian Learning and Associative Memory for LLM Agents (2026) · cites this paper as Hebb, 2005

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hebb, D. O.
Corresponding author
Hebb, D.O.
Venue
Psychology Press eBooks
Published
2005-04-11
Pages
43-54
OpenAlex
W22297218
Cited by
9,825
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 65 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 145 · 2022: 142 · 2021: 217 · 2020: 252 · 2019: 223 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 236 · 2016: 259 · 2015: 283 · 2014: 319 · 2013: 306 · 2012: 258
FWCI
91.14
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • The MIT Press eBooks
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
synaptic organization, artificial neural networks, Hebbian learning rule, environmental enrichment, experience-dependent brain development, neuropsychological theory, history of neuroscience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review