The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A note on functional relations obtained from group data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sudden gains and critical sessions in cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression.
Tang, T. Z., & DeRubeis, R. J. (1999) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.67.6.894 · Cited by 684
Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Discounting Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards
Du, W., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2002) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395199 · Cited by 513
Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies
Ramsay, C. R., Grant, A. M., Wallace, S. A., Garthwaite, P. H., Monk, A. F., & Russell, I. T. (2001) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta5120 · Cited by 353
Differential effects of amount on temporal and probability discounting of gains and losses
Estle, S. J., Green, L., Myerson, J., & Holt, D. D. (2006) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193437 · Cited by 342
Exponential versus hyperbolic discounting of delayed outcomes: Risk and waiting time.
GREEN, L., & MYERSON, J. (1996) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/36.4.496 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Sidman, M.
- Venue
- Psychological Bulletin
- Published
- 1952
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-269
- ISSN
- 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1455
- OpenAlex
- W2087910257
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A note on functional relations obtained from group data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0063643
- The paper
- Sidman, M. (1952). A note on functional relations obtained from group data. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063643
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
