The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The method of paired comparisons for social values.
Abstract
This is an attempt to apply the ideas of psychophysical measurement in the field of social values. Some of the psychophysical methods have been applied in a crude way to the measurement of educational products such as handwriting and English composition, and it seems feasible to apply the same ideas as well to social values although the attempt cannot readily be made without making compromises that the psychophysicist would not tolerate. The application of the principles of psychophysical measurement to educational products has been made with more or less similar logical handicaps but these do not seem to have disturbed the popularity of these methods in the field of educational measurement. Since the final results show a rather satisfactory internal consistency, one may possibly assume that the methods, the theoretically imperfect, have some value also in social psychology. For the present experiment the seriousness of different crimes or offenses was chosen for such measurement. The seriousness of an offense we shall assume to be the seriousness as judged rather than as measured in terms of objective consequences or in some normative way. Nineteen offenses were judged: abortion, adultery, arson, assault and battery, bootlegging, burglary, counterfeiting, embezzlement, forgery, homicide, kidnapping, larceny, libel, perjury, rape, receiving stolen goods, seduction, smuggling, and vagrancy. The offenses were arranged in pairs so that every one of them was paired with every other one. The total number of pairs of offenses presented was therefore n(n-1)/2 = 171. College student subjects were presented with the paired offenses and asked to choose which they considered to be the more serious crime. Results show that qualitative judgments of a rather intangible sort, loaded usually with personal opinion, bias, and even strong feeling, and regarded generally as the direct antithesis of quantitative measurement, are nevertheless amenable to the type of quantitative analysis which is associated historically with psychophysics. It is of some interest to see that a set of numerical values can be established by which the 171 observed proportions of judgments about crimes and offenses can be summarized in generalized form. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved)
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Respondents in a 1926 survey of college students rated rape as slightly more serious than homicide”
From Rape or Homicide: Which Is Worse? (2024) · cites this paper as Thurstone, 1927
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION TREES: A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR MODELING SPECIES–ENVIRONMENT RELATIONSHIPS
De’ath, G. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1105:mrtant]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,275
“Thus db-MRT, but not A-MRT, can be used in pairwise comparison studies, for which only the dissimilarities (or similarities) between subjects are available (Thurstone 1927).”
MethodIntegration theory and attitude change.
Anderson, N. H. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0030834 · Cited by 934
Hobart, J., & Cano, S. (2009) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta13120 · Cited by 621
Diez pasos para la construcción de un test
Muñiz, J., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2019) · Psicothema · doi:10.7334/psicothema2018.291 · Cited by 330
“…de su facilidad de aplicación y de su adaptación a cualquier ámbito de evaluación, de ahí que en la práctica se haya impuesto a otros modelos mejor fundados científi camente, pero de aplicación menos sencilla, como el de las comparaciones binarias de Thurstone (1927a, 1927b, 1928), entre otros.”
Statistical ranking and combinatorial Hodge theory
Jiang, X., Lim, L., Yao, Y., & Ye, Y. (2010) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s10107-010-0419-x · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Thurstone, L. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thurstone, L. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1927-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 384-400
- ISSN
- 0096-851X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075806862
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Keywords
- paired comparison method, social values, psychophysical measurement, crime severity, value measurement, qualitative judgment, university students, internal consistency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review