Cited by 5Sexual Assault and Victimization StudiesPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Rape or Homicide: Which Is Worse?

Open access
Felson, Richard B., Silver, Eric·2024·Archives of Sexual Behavior

Abstract

Some people believe rape is just as serious as homicide, or more serious, contrary to law. We examined the prevalence of this belief and whether it reflects an individual's political ideology and moral foundations. Analyses were based on a national YouGov survey of 1,125 US adults gathered in 2021. We found that only 26% of respondents believed rape was less serious than homicide. Most (61%) believed rape and homicide were equally serious, while 13% believed rape was more serious. Social progressives (particularly progressive women) were more likely than social conservatives to view rape as more serious or just as serious as homicide. However, this tendency was partially offset by the tendency of social progressives to view harm as a key factor in judging the morality of a behavior. We suggest that social progressives view rape more seriously than social conservatives because of their concern for gender inequality, but this concern is partially offset by their concern with harm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10508-023-02799-w

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

7 of 77 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Progressives are less tolerant of instrumental harm when it is directed at women than when it is directed at men.

    “they are less tolerant of instrumental harm when it is directed at women than when it is directed at men”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Graso et al., 2023 source
  • Premisecitation

    Offenders are punished more severely when their victims are women than when their victims are men.

    “Research on the criminal justice system shows that offenders are punished more severely when their victims are women than when their victims are men”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Baumer et al., 2000 source
    • cites Curry, 2010 source
    • cites Holcomb et al., 2004 source

      The Victim Demographics section says homicide and death-penalty research consistently finds more severe treatment of cases with female victims, but cautions that responses vary by type of crime. The Results and Discussion section finds higher odds of a death sentence for homicides with female rather than male victims. These passages support the claim for homicide and capital sentencing, not for punishment across the criminal justice system generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisereasoning

    Progressives tend to view crimes involving violence against women as more serious.

    “progressives tend to view crimes involving violence against women as more serious”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Buzawa et al., 2022

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Graso et al., 2023 source

      The General Discussion (Theoretical and Practical Implications; page unavailable) reports that people endorsing liberal ideologies showed greater disparities in tolerance of instrumental harm to men versus women. But the study assessed support for beneficial interventions that caused harm, not judgments of how serious violent crimes are. The Results (Exploratory Analyses; page unavailable) also report no significant ideological difference when women were harmed. (LLM, conf=0.79)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Akman et al. (1968) found that Canadian students in 1964-1965 rated homicide as more serious, regardless of gender.

    “Akman et al. (1968) found that Canadian students in 1964-1965 rated homicide as more serious, regardless of gender”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Akman et al. (1968) source

      Table 10 reports that Canadian students gave assault resulting in death the highest seriousness score among the listed offences. However, “Men-Women Magnitude Scores Compared” and “Interpretation of Findings” report a gender difference: men rated murder relatively more seriously than women. The Research Procedures use 1964–1965 enrollment figures to size the sample, but do not establish that the ratings were made in those years. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    In a 2021 YouGov national survey of 1,125 US adults, 26% of respondents believed rape was less serious than homicide.

    “We found that only 26% of respondents believed rape was less serious than homicide.”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “Respondents were twice as likely to think rape was less serious than they were to think it was more serious (26% vs 13%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 30
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 53
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    McCollister et al. estimated that murder produced the greatest loss to society at nearly $9 million per offense, rape/sexual assault followed with a total per-offense cost of $240,776, and the economic cost of murder was more than 37 times the cost of rape.

    “They estimated that murder produced the greatest loss to society at nearly $9 million per offense.Rape/ sexual assault followed murder with a total per-offense cost of $240,776.The economic cost of murder was more than 37 times the cost of rape, according to their estimates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McCollister et al. (2010) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Attitudes about social-cultural and economic issues are correlated but distinct.

    “While attitudes about social-cultural and economic issues are correlated, they are distinct”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Malka et al., 2019 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The study joins a growing number within criminology that find MFT useful for explaining crime and justice-related outcomes.

    “Finally, our study joins a growing number within criminology which find that MFT is useful for explaining crime and justice-related outcomes (e.g., Burton et al., 2021;Nix et al., 2021;Silver & Silver, 2021;Silver et al., 2022;Vaughan et al., 2019).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Burton et al., 2021 source
    • cites Nix et al., 2021 source
    • cites Silver & Silver, 2021 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The pattern of predicted values shows a strong inverse relationship between progressivism and the relative seriousness of rape for women but not for men.

    “The pattern of predicted values (see Fig. 1) shows a strong inverse relationship between progressivism and the relative seriousness of rape for women but not for men.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There was no evidence that relative judgments of rape and homicide are related to age, education, or race/ethnicity, except that those who identified as other race were more likely to view rape as more serious than homicide when harm orientation was removed from the model.

    “we saw no evidence that the relative judgments of rape and homicide are related to the age, education, or race/ethnicity of the respondent, except that those who identified as “other” race were more likely view rape as more serious than homicide when harm orientation was removed from the model.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The coefficient for gender traditionalism predicting viewing rape as more serious than homicide was not statistically significant (b = 0.13, SE = 0.08, p = .13).

    “However, the coefficient for viewing rape as more serious than homicide was not statistically significant (b = 0.13, SE = 0.08, p = .13).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    In the past, the death penalty was given to rape offenders and seduction laws existed to punish more minor sexual mistreatment of women by men.

    “In the past, the death penalty was given to rape offenders and seduction laws existed to punish more minor sexual mistreatment of women by men.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The coefficient for progressive attitudes on believing rape is less serious than homicide versus equally serious is in the predicted direction but weak and not statistically significant.

    “Model 4 in the right panel of Table 2 shows that the coefficient for progressive attitudes is in the predicted direction, but it is weak and not statistically significant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In a nationally representative sample, 26% of respondents viewed rape as less serious than homicide, 61% viewed them as equally serious, and 13% viewed rape as more serious.

    “However, our evidence from a nationally representative sample suggests that only 26% of respondents view rape as less serious.Most (61%) view rape as being equally serious and 13% view it as more serious.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The correlation between the gender traditionalism item and the social progressivism measure was r = -0.35 (p < .001).

    “Still, the correlation between this item and our measure of social progressivism was r = -0.35(p = < .001).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    None of the three binding moral foundations (loyalty, respect for authority, sanctity) were related to beliefs about the relative seriousness of rape and homicide.

    “Finally, we examined the three”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In a supplementary ordered regression treating the rape/homicide judgment as a continuous variable, the results were similar to the main results, including the statistical interaction.

    “In a supplementary analysis, we treated the judgment of rape/ homicide as a continuous variable and used ordered regression.The results were similar, including the statistical interaction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neither interaction between gender traditionalism and respondent sex was statistically significant (rape less serious: b = 0.20, SE = 0.13, p = .14; rape more serious: b = 0.09, SE = 0.18, p = .61).

    “Both statistical interactions between gender traditionalism and respondent sex were in the predicted direction, but neither was statistically significant (b = 0.20, SE = 0.13, p = .14for rape being less serious; b = 0.09, SE = 0.18, p = .61for rape being more serious).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The patterns observed were similar (although not always statistically significant) when the gender traditionalism item was substituted for the progressivism scale.

    “Finally, the patterns we observed were similar (although not always statistically significant) when we substituted the gender traditionalism item for our progressivism scale.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Some prior studies found homicide ranked as more serious, some less serious, and some equally serious, and some found the ranking depended on gender.

    “Some studies found that homicide was ranked as more serious, some less serious, and some equally serious.Some studies found that the ranking depended on gender.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Conservatives view drug crimes as more serious than do progressives.

    “research has found that conservatives view drug crimes as more serious than do progressives”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stylianou, 2003 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Social progressives view rape more seriously than social conservatives because of their concern for gender inequality, but this concern is partially offset by their concern with harm.

    “We suggest that social progressives view rape more seriously than social conservatives because of their concern for gender inequality, but this concern is partially offset by their concern with harm.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The prior surveys found were based on ratings or rankings of many crimes, did not force respondents to directly compare rape and homicide, and were at least twenty years old, with the larger American surveys at least forty years old.

    “The surveys we found were based on ratings or rankings of many crimes; they did not force respondents to directly compare the seriousness of rape and homicide.All of them were at least twenty years old and the larger American surveys were at least forty years old.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Prior research shows that many people in the past viewed rape as just as serious as homicide.

    “prior research shows that many people in the past viewed rape as just as serious as homicide”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Felson and Feld (2009) found that respondents in a nationally representative sample judged violence against women more harshly than violence against men whether they were liberals, conservatives, or moderates.

    “Felson and Feld (2009) found that respondents in a nationally representative sample judged violence against women more harshly than violence against men whether they were liberals, conservatives, or moderates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Felson and Feld (2009) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rape has characteristics that may increase judgments of its severity and make it more comparable to homicide, including violating bodily control, causing severe physical and psychological harm, causing STDs and unwanted pregnancies, creating fear among women, involving violation of trust, and reinforcing gender inequalities.

    “rape violates a person's right to control their own body; it can cause severe physical and psychological harm to the victim; it can result in sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancies; it creates a climate of fear and insecurity among women; it often involves a violation of trust; and it may reinforce gender inequalities”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tjaden & Thoennes, 2006 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Moral foundations theory conceptualizes morality as rooted in a dual process system in which intuitive moral cognitions precede and influence deliberative moral reasoning.

    “Moral foundations theory (MFT; Haidt, 2012) conceptualizes morality as rooted in a “dual process” system in which intuitive moral cognitions, i.e., moral foundations, precede and influence deliberative moral reasoning”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Haidt, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Kahneman, 2011

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rape typically involves a man's violence against a woman, while homicide typically involves two men.

    “Rape typically involves a man's violence against a woman, while homicide typically involves two men”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites U.S Department of Justice, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Hsu (1973) found that female students in Taiwan in 1968 rated rape as more serious, while males rated homicide as more serious.

    “Hsu (1973) found that female students in Taiwan in 1968 rated rape as more serious, while the males rated homicide as more serious.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hsu (1973) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    They judge wrongfulness based on how much blame they attribute to the offender and the importance of the social norm that has been violated.

    “They judge wrongfulness based on how much blame they attribute to the offender and the importance of the social norm that has been violated.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The decision about which offense is more serious is difficult because it depends on the criteria one uses.

    “Note that the decision is difficult because it depends on the criteria one uses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These explanations can help account for why some respondents view rape as just as serious as homicide, but they cannot explain why progressive women view rape more seriously.

    “These explanations can help account for why some respondents view rape as just as serious as homicide, but they cannot explain why progressive women view rape more seriously.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Some progressives may believe that rape is more harmful than homicide, especially if they believe that rape victims suffer serious emotional consequences and that some never recover.

    “However, we recognize that some progressives may believe that rape is more harmful than homicide, especially if they believe that rape victims suffer serious emotional consequences and that some never recover.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Progressivism is a difficult concept to precisely define, and beliefs about systemic racism do not fully define the attitudes of progressives.

    “Progressivism is a difficult concept to precisely define and beliefs about systemic racism do not fully define the attitudes of progressives.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    While there is considerable consensus about the relative seriousness of different offenses, political ideology and moral foundations can affect judgments.

    “While there is considerable consensus about the relative seriousness of different offenses (e.g., Robinson & Kurzban, 2006), political ideology and moral foundations can affect judgments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Robinson & Kurzban, 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The final sample included 1,113 respondents after cases with missing data were removed.

    “The final sample included 1,113 respondents, after cases with missing data were removed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Social progressives' concern for inequality may lead them to be less punitive toward offenders (often minorities) but more punitive toward those who attack minorities and women.

    “Their concern for inequality may lead them to be less punitive toward offenders (who are often minorities) but more punitive toward those who attack minorities and women (e.g., Felson, 1991).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Felson, 1991 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Individuals base their judgements about the seriousness of different types of crime on their perceptions of harm and wrongfulness.

    “Individuals base their judgements about the seriousness of different types of crime on their perceptions of harm and wrongfulness (Warr, 1985(Warr, , 1989)).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Warr, 1985 source
    • cites Warr, 1989 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The harm orientation scale had alpha = 0.73.

    “The items were averaged to form a scale (alpha = 0.73).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In the former case, progressives focus on the offender's lower social status; in the latter, on the victim's lower social status.

    “In the former case, they focus on the offender's lower social status, while, in the latter case, they focus on the victim's lower social status.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    People may have difficulty deciding which of two evils is worse and may describe the two offenses as equally serious because that is the path of least cognitive effort.

    “It may also be the case that people have difficulty deciding which of two evils is worse.They may describe the two offenses as equally serious because that is the path of least cognitive effort.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Attitudes toward gender and rape might be related due to overlapping measurement.

    “Attitudes toward gender and rape might be related due to overlapping measurement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Haidt categorizes moral foundations into five domains: harm, fairness, respect for authority, ingroup loyalty, and sanctity.

    “Haidt (2012) categorizes moral foundations into five domains: harm, fairness, respect for authority, ingroup loyalty, and sanctity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Haidt (2012)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Some respondents described as progressive based on racial attitudes may not be progressive on gender issues.

    “Some of the respondents we describe as progressive based on their racial attitudes may not be progressive on gender issues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    One cannot be confident about causal inferences based on cross-sectional analyses of correlational data.

    “We recognize, of course, that one cannot be confident about causal inferences based on cross-sectional analyses of correlational data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The harm foundation is the most theoretically germane foundation in judging the relative importance of rape and homicide.

    “The harm foundation is the most theoretically germane foundation in judging the relative importance of rape and homicide”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Haidt, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    People envision some homicides as justifiable (e.g., self-defense or reaction to provocation) and are less likely to imagine justifications for rape.

    “Another explanation is that people envision some homicides as justifiable.They may attribute some homicides to self-defense or view them as a reaction to a strong provocation.On the other hand, they may be less likely to imagine justifications for rape.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    It is an advantage that the measure of social progressivism focuses on attitudes toward inequality in a domain separate from gender.

    “Fourth, we see it as an advantage that our measure of social progressivism focuses on attitudes toward inequality in a domain separate from gender.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is difficult to imagine an explanation of the strong association between beliefs about systemic racism and attitudes toward rape and the statistical interaction that does not involve the effects of progressivism.

    “Third, it is difficult to imagine an explanation of the strong association between beliefs about systematic racism and attitudes toward rape and the statistical interaction we observe that does not involve the effects of progressivism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    YouGov uses a model-based sampling approach to produce matched, weighted samples that generalize extremely well to the US adult population.

    “YouGov uses a model-based sampling approach to produce matched, weighted samples that generalize extremely well to the US adult population”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Ansolabehere & Rivers, 2013 source
    • cites Ansolabehere & Schaffner, 2014 source
    • cites Graham et al., 2021 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    An evolutionary perspective suggests that rape is judged as extremely serious because the reproductive success and ultimate fitness of women are jeopardized by anything that circumvents their mate choice.

    “As indicated above, an evolutionary perspective suggests that rape is judged as extremely serious because the reproductive success and ultimate fitness of women are jeopardized by anything that circumvents their mate choice (Buss, 2021;McKibbin & Shackelford, 2011;Symons, 1979).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Buss, 2021
    • cites McKibbin & Shackelford, 2011 source
    • cites Symons, 1979
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Progressives' attitude toward inequality may lead them to view rape as more serious, while their harm orientation may lead them to view homicide as more serious.

    “Progressives' attitude toward inequality may lead them to view rape as more serious, while their harm orientation may lead them to view homicide as more serious.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is difficult to imagine alternative explanations of the observed relationship between progressivism and attitudes toward rape and homicide.

    “However, it is difficult to imagine alternative explanations of the relationship between progressivism and attitudes toward rape and homicide that we observe.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    The trauma may be greater if victims believe that rape is more serious or just as serious as homicide.

    “In addition, the trauma may be greater if victims believe that rape is more serious or just as serious as homicide (Felson, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Felson, 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Prior research shows that people are much more likely to condemn male violence when the victim is a woman.

    “Prior research shows that people are much more likely to condemn male violence when the victim is a woman, so it seems unnecessary to examine gender differences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Data were collected by YouGov after receiving approval from the authors' university's institutional review board.

    “Data were collected by YouGov after receiving approval from the authors' university's institutional review board.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Severe punishments can make convictions more difficult if jurors are reluctant to incarcerate offenders for long periods of time.

    “On the other hand, severe punishments can make convictions more difficult if jurors are reluctant to incarcerate offenders for long periods of times (Hong, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hong, 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some people do attempt to excuse or justify rape.

    “Of course, some people do attempt to excuse or justify rape (e.g.,Kanin, 1985;Yapp & Quayle, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kanin, 1985 source
    • cites Yapp & Quayle, 2018 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    A sixth item (

    “A sixth item (It can never be right to kill a human being) was omitted from the scale because it reduced the scale alpha to .67.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    YouGov obtained informed consent from all participants included in the study.

    “YouGov obtained informed consent from all participants included in the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The scaling would not affect the multivariate results.

    “Note that the scaling would not affect our multivariate results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    No significance tests were performed in these studies.

    “No significance tests were performed in these studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The observed pattern is so strong that scaling effects would not affect our conclusions.

    “However, the observed pattern is so strong that scaling effects would not affect our conclusions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Attitudes toward the seriousness of rape in relation to homicide may have important consequences, both positive and negative.

    “Attitudes toward the seriousness of rape in relation to homicide may have important consequences, both positive and negative.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The normative protection of women from men is sometimes described as chivalry and other times as benevolent sexism or paternalism.

    “The normative protection of women from men is sometimes described as chivalry and other times described as benevolent sexism or paternalism (e.g.,Felson, 2002;Glick & Fiske, 1996).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Felson, 2002 source
    • cites Glick & Fiske, 1996 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The KHB test was developed for nonlinear dependent variables, but in STATA it can be applied to linear ones as well, in which case it is the same as the Sobel test.

    “The KHB test was developed for nonlinear dependent variables(Breen et al., 2013), but in STATA it can be applied to linear ones as well, in which case it is the same as the Sobel test.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Breen et al., 2013 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Most research in the social sciences focuses on explaining the behavior and attitudes of conservatives, relying on concepts such as right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, or system justification.

    “Most research in the social sciences focuses on explaining the behavior and attitudes of conservatives, relying on concepts such as rightwing authoritarianism (Altemeyer, 1981), social dominance orientation (Sidanius & Pratto, 2008), or system justification (Jost et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Altemeyer, 1981

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Sidanius & Pratto, 2008

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Jost et al., 2004 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Those with a harm orientation base their decision on the degree of harm and are therefore more inclined to rank the crime resulting in death as more serious.

    “Those with a harm orientation base their decision on the degree of harm and are therefore more inclined to rank the crime resulting in death as more serious.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Viewing rape as more serious than homicide is one such issue (difficult to explain without reference to a progressive ideology).

    “Viewing rape as more serious than homicide is one such issue.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The attitude that rape is more serious than homicide may deter potential rapists if they realize the seriousness of the crime.

    “The attitude may also deter potential rapists if they realize the seriousness of the crime.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Marital rape was not studied.

    “Marital rape was not studied.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The research is unusual in that it attempts to explain the attitudes of progressives rather than the attitudes of conservatives.

    “Our research is unusual in that it attempts to explain the attitudes of progressives rather than the attitudes of conservatives.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Recovery may be more difficult for victims who believe that they have suffered a fate worse than death.

    “Recovery may be more difficult for victims who believe that they have suffered a fate worse than death.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Women with a progressive ideology focus more on the seriousness of violence against women and are therefore more inclined to rank rape as more serious.

    “Women with a progressive ideology, on the other hand, focus more on the seriousness of violence against women; they are therefore more inclined to rank rape as more serious.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    None of the VIFs for all measures exceeded 1.31, below the critical value of 4.00 for multicollinearity problems.

    “We examined the variance inflation factors (VIFs) for all measures and found that none exceeded 1.31, which is below the critical value of 4.00 typically employed to indicate multicollinearity problems(Fisher & Mason, 1981).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fisher & Mason, 1981

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study was approved by a university IRB.

    “The study was approved by a university IRB.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Activists who depict rape as more serious than homicide may be better able to gain support for efforts to reduce violence against women.

    “On the one hand, activists who depict rape as more serious than homicide may be better able to gain support for their efforts to reduce violence against women (e.g., Best, 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Best, 2017 source
72 of 72
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In Western cultures, the death of a loved one is considered worse than the rape of a loved one.

    “It seems reasonable to assume that, at least in Western cultures, the death of a loved one is considered worse than the rape of a loved one.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Virtually everyone views both rape and homicide as extremely serious.

    “Virtually everyone views both rape and homicide as extremely serious so a forced comparison better reveals the respondent's attitude toward rape.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Variation in respondents' conceptions of rape and homicide would not affect the conclusions about the effects of political ideology and a greater moral sensitivity to harm.

    “In any case, variation in respondents' conceptions of rape and homicide would not affect our conclusions about the effects of political ideology and a greater moral sensitivity to harm.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The measure of social progressivism based on beliefs about systemic racism adequately captures social progressivism for the study's purposes.

    “If our measure does not fully capture the attitudes of social progressives, we may under-estimate its effects.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Homicide is the more serious offense according to legal statutes and civil settlements.

    “Homicide is the more serious offense according to legal statutes and civil settlements.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The behavior of victims and the feelings of their loved ones suggest that homicide is viewed as more serious than rape.

    “The behavior of victims and the feelings of their loved ones suggest the same ordering.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Attitudes toward the seriousness of rape have not changed much over the last 100 years despite dramatic changes in attitudes toward gender roles.

    “It is noteworthy that attitudes toward the seriousness of rape have not changed much given dramatic changes in attitudes toward gender roles in the last 100 years.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Violence against women is a central concern among progressive women.

    “Currently, violence against women is a central concern among progressive women.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The moral foundation favored by progressives is an emphasis on harm.

    “The moral foundation favored by progressives -an emphasis on harm-is also related to their judgments.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The worse the offense, the more it deserves attention.

    “The worse the offense, the more it deserves attention.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some behaviors, attitudes, and policy preferences—particularly those associated with social justice—are difficult to explain without reference to a progressive ideology.

    “Yet some behaviors, attitudes, and policy preferences-particularly those associated with social justice-are difficult to explain without reference to a progressive ideology.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The American Community Survey is an ongoing, nationally representative survey conducted by the US Census Bureau each year, sent to over 3.5 million households in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.

    “The American Community Survey is an ongoing, nationally representative survey conducted by the US Census Bureau each year.It is sent to over 3.5 million households in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico.”
12 of 12

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • ConsistentF(1, 1114) = 47.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(1, 1114) = 47.67,p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(1, 1114) = 73.76reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(1, 1114) = 73.76,p < .001”

2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Results name the wrong race category as the exception

    Minor

    The results say the exception for race was the "other" race category when harm orientation was omitted. In Model 2, the significant coefficient is instead for non-Latino Black respondents; the "other" race coefficient is not marked significant.

  • Descriptive table and methods report different sample sizes

    Minor

    The methods state that the final sample contained 1,113 respondents after missing cases were removed, but Table 1 labels its descriptive statistics as based on 1,117. The text does not explain the different sample sizes.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 104 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kaufmann, E. (2019). Whiteshift: Populism, immigration, and the future of White majorities. Abrams Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Felson, R. B., & Silver, E.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Felson, Richard B.
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
2024-01-24
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
1001-1013
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
OpenAlex
W4391161083
Cited by
5
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarSphere (Penn State Libraries) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
rape, homicide, moral foundations, political ideology, social progressivism, social conservatism, gender inequality, harm, moral judgment, sexual violence attitudes
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Homicide, Humans, Morals, Politics, Rape

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review