Cited by 120Behavioral and Psychological StudiesEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessEducation, Psychology, and Social Research

An Evaluation of Certain Incentives Used in School Work.

Hurlock, Elizabeth B.·1925·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

In the present experiment, an attempt has been made to evaluate reproof, when used continuously over a given period of time, with praise used in a similar manner. In addition to this, the writer endeavored to discover what, if any, improvement would be found in the work of a group of children who, a

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0067716

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hurlock's 1925 study reported that praising pupils' work improved performance more than criticizing their efforts.

    “Hurlock's (1925) seminal work highlighted the finding that praise of students' work has a more powerful effect on performance than criticism of students' efforts.”

    From The Principles of Strengths-Based Education (2009) · cites this paper as Hurlock (1925)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hurlock, E. B.
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
1925-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
145-159
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W1978801825
Cited by
120
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
8.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education, Psychology, and Social Research
Keywords
reproof, praise, punishment, reward, student motivation, school work, children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review