The psychology of belief.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Initial information has a great impact in priming and creating expectations, and thus can bias if and how subsequent information is processed.
“The idea behind LSU and LSU-E is that the initial information has a great impact in priming and creating expectations, and thus can bias if and how subsequent information is processed”
From Biased and biasing: the hidden bias cascade and bias snowball effects (2025) · cites this paper as Lund, 1925
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Holbert, R. L., Lambe, J. L., Dudo, A. D., & Carlton, K. A. (2007) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838150701308002 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Biased and biasing: the hidden bias cascade and bias snowball effects
Dror, I. E. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15040490 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lund, F. H.
- Corresponding author
- Lund, F. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
- Published
- 1925-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-195
- ISSN
- 0096-851X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4213085254
- Cited by
- 60
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- belief, psychology of belief, belief formation, cognitive psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
