Cited by 119Media Studies and CommunicationMedia Influence and PoliticsCommunication and COVID-19 Impact

Primacy Effects of The Daily Show and National TV News Viewing: Young Viewers, Political Gratifications, and Internal Political Self-Efficacy

Holbert, R. Lance, Lambe, Jennifer L., Dudo, Anthony D., Carlton, Kristin A.·2007·Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media

Abstract

This study examines program ordering effects derived from viewing CNN television news relative to The Daily Show on the political gratifications associated with both types of information sources. Internal political self-efficacy is assessed as an individual-difference moderator. Main primacy effects are found on the gratifications associated with both national television news viewing and The Daily Show viewing. However, The Daily Show primacy effect on the political gratifications associated with national television news viewing was isolated among those participants who retain low internal political self-efficacy. Ramifications for these findings are outlined and future lines of research are summarized.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08838150701308002

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fake news across the spectrum, even the most innocuous satire, has arguably led to increasingly blurred lines between what is seen as real news and what is seen as fake, resulting in a gradual decline of trust in traditional real, or 'hard' news sources.

    “Moreover fake news across the spectrum, even the most innocuous satire, has arguably [3,14,15] also led to increasingly blurred lines between what is seen as real news and what is seen as fake, resulting in a gradual decline of trust in traditional real, or 'hard' news sources [16].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holbert, R. L., Lambe, J. L., Dudo, A. D., & Carlton, K. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
Published
2007-04-10
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
20-38
ISSN
  • 0883-8151 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-6878
OpenAlex
W2140837457
Cited by
119
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
27.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Keywords
primacy effect, The Daily Show, television news viewing, young audiences, individual differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review