Cited by 237Evolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPersonality Traits and Psychology

When beauty may fail

Dermer, Marshall, Thiel, Darrel L.·1975·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

The Dion, Berscheid, and Walster person perception study was quasi repli-cated in order to assess the generality of the "what is beautiful is good " stereo-type. In Experiment 1, female participants who were either unattractive, average, or physically attractive made a variety of attributions about female target persons of varying attractiveness levels. Attribution favorability was found to be contingent upon the physical attractiveness of the participant as well as the dimensions along which the attributions were made. While many of the attributions were congruent with the postulated stereotype, others were not. Socially undesirable attributions regarding vanity, egotism, likelihood of marital disaster (requesting a divorce/having an extramarital affair), and likelihood of being bourgeois (materialistic/snobbish/unsympathetic to op-pressed peoples) were reliably increasing monotonic functions of target persons' attractiveness levels. Plausible explanations for these divergencies were explored in Experiment 2. The work of Berscheid, Walster, and col-leagues (e.g., Berscheid & Walster, 1974) suggests that physically attractive as com-pared to unattractive individuals generally have a considerable social advantage. To account for why beautiful people might be preferred, Dion, Berscheid, and Walster (1972) postulated the existence of a physical attractiveness stereotype—"what is beautiful is good. " In the Dion et al. person perception study, participants attempted to estimate a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0077085

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The identified saturation effect provides a unifying explanation for several inconsistent findings reported in the literature regarding the existence and strength of the attractiveness halo effect.

    “However, the identified saturation effect provides a unifying explanation for several inconsistent findings reported in the literature regarding the existence [38,39] and strength [11,41,80] of the attractiveness halo effect.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dermer, M., & Thiel, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1975-06
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
1168-1176
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2101627327
Cited by
237
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
physical attractiveness, person perception, social attribution, attractiveness stereotypes, social desirability, vanity, egotism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review