Cited by 3,424Social and Intergroup PsychologyPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentPersonality Traits and Psychology

From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception

Jones, Edward E., Davis, Keith E.·1965·Advances in Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Davis, K. E. (1962). Impressions of others and interaction context as determinants of social interaction and perception in two-person discussion groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Duke Univer.
  2. Gergen, K. J. (1962). Interaction goals and personalistic feedback as factors affecting the presentation of the self. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Duke Univer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Venue
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1965
Pages
219-266
ISSN
0065-2601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066057850
Cited by
3,424
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 85 · 2019: 110 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 88
FWCI
48.66
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in experimental social psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
person perception, attribution theory, intention attribution, in-role behavior, distinctiveness, personal involvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review