Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 599

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes.

Cheesman, Jim, Merikle, Philip M.·1986·Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie

Abstract

Deux experiences avec une tâche d'amorce type stroop indiquent que les mots masques de couleur presentes au-dela et en-deca du seuil subjectif permettent d'amorcer l'identification verbale ulterieure de taches de couleur. Les amorces presentees de part et d'autre du seuil subjectif ont des effets qualitatifs differents; des variations dans la proportion d'essais ou amorces et cibles sont congruentes menent a l'adoption d'une strategie de prediction quand les amorces sont presentees au-dela du seuil subjectif, mais pas quand elles sont presentees sous le seuil subjectif

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0080103

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 599

Metadata

Authors
Cheesman, J., & Merikle, P. M.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie
Published
1986-12
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
343-367
ISSN
0008-4255 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010997645
Cited by
599
References
0
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/h0080103
The paper
Cheesman, J., & Merikle, P. M. (1986). Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0080103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.