Cited by 23Palliative and Oncologic CarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints

The role of the psychologist in determining competence for assisted suicide/euthanasia in the terminally ill

Galbraith, Kim M., Dobson, Keith S.·2000·Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne

Abstract

This paper discusses the history of assisted suicide/euthanasia and public attitudes in Canada; discusses depression in the terminally ill and the potential role of the psychologist in the assisted suicide/euthanasia process; and specifically addresses the importance of determining competence in terminally ill patients. One area in which the services of psychologists have not been used to their fullest potential is in the care of the terminally ill, particularly in helping them make end-of-life decisions. It is very important that individuals making end-of-life decisions be used to assessed for mental disorders in order to ensure that they are able to make competent decisions. If assisted suicide and euthanasia were to become legalized, psychologists should be involved in the assessment process in order to determine competency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0086867

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Galbraith, K. M., & Dobson, K. S.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne
Published
2000-08
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
174-183
ISSN
  • 0708-5591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-7304
OpenAlex
W2007417234
Cited by
23
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Keywords
assisted suicide, euthanasia, competency assessment, dying patients, end-of-life decisions, depression, psychologist role, mental illness, legalization of euthanasia, public attitudes, history of euthanasia, Canada
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Canada, Culture, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Psychology, Public Opinion, Public Policy, Right to Die, Mental Competency, Suicide, Assisted, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Terminally Ill, Professional Role, Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review