Cited by 127Reading and Literacy DevelopmentEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Assessment for instructional decisions: Toward a proactive/prevention model of decision-making for early literacy skills.

Good, Roland H., Kaminski, Ruth A.·1996·School Psychology Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0088938

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A.
Venue
School Psychology Quarterly
Published
1996
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
326-336
ISSN
  • 1045-3830 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1560
OpenAlex
W2029938496
Cited by
127
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
School Psychology Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
early literacy, instructional decision-making, proactive prevention, early detection, reading skills, literacy intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review