Functional Analytic Psychotherapy (FAP): A review of publications from 1990 to 2010.
Open accessAbstract
Functional Analytic Psychotherapy (FAP), a model for psychotherapy based on radical behaviorism first developed by Kohlenberg and Tsai in 1991 (translated into Portuguese in 2001), proposes that the therapeutic relationship is the primary context for behavioral change in the therapeutic process for clients with interpersonal problems (Kohlenberg & Tsai, 2001; Kohlenberg, Tsai & Kanter, 2009). The authors suggest that everything the therapist needs and can use to help clients through the change process occurs during the session, in the therapeutic relationship. Specifically, FAP encourages the therapist to identify three classes of client clinically relevant behavior (CRB) occurring in session: CRB1, defined as behavioral problems occurring in session; CRB2, defined as behavioral improvements or progress in session, and CRB3, defined as the client's descriptions about the functional controlling variables of his behaviors (both inside and outside the session). FAP systematizes five rules around which the therapist should base treatment, including: (1) Observe the occurrence of CRBs, (2) Evoke CRBs, (3) Reinforce CRB2s, (4) Observe the reinforcing effects of therapist behavior on CRBs, and (5) Provide interpretations about the variables that affect client's behavior (Tsai et al, 2009). Since the FAP book appeared in 1991, many theoretical and empirical papers have appeared. These papers have been quite diverse. For example, several studies have been conducted to demonstrate how…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FAP is an effective approach for achieving clinical improvements in different settings and conditions.
“The empirical evidence shows that FAP is an effective approach for achieving clinical improvements in different settings and conditions (Aguayo, García, & Bermúdez, 2015; Kanter et al., 2017; Mangabeira, Kanter, & del Prette, 2012).”
From The efficacy of functional-analytic psychotherapy and acceptance and commitment therapy (FACT) for public employees (2019) · cites this paper as Mangabeira, Kanter, & del Prette, 2012
Cites
Efficacy of the third wave of behavioral therapies: A systematic review and meta- analysis
Öst, L.-G. (2008) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2007.12.005 · Cited by 727 · see citing works
Functional Analytic Psychotherapy: Creating Intense and Curative Therapeutic Relationships
Kohlenberg, R. J., & Tsai, M. (1991) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70855-3 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
DBT, FAP, and ACT: How empirically oriented are the new behavior therapy technologies?
Hayes, S. C., Masuda, A., Bissett, R., Luoma, J., & Guerrero, L. F. (2004) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(04)80003-0 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Acceptance-based psychotherapy in the treatment of an adjudicated exhibitionist: A case example
Paul, R. H., Marx, B. P., & Orsillo, S. M. (1999) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(99)80051-3 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Aplicación Clínica de Modelos Terapéuticos No Mediacionales en un Caso de Trastorno Mixto del Afecto
Novoa Gómez, M. M., & Guzmán Gutiérrez, D. (2008) · Terapia Psicologica · doi:10.4067/s0718-48082008000200012 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quality of life in women with lipoedema: a contextual behavioral approach
Dudek, J. E., Białaszek, W., & Ostaszewski, P. (2016) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-015-1080-x · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Byrne, G., & Ní Ghráda, Á. (2019) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2019.01.001 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Macías, J., Valero-Aguayo, L., Bond, F., & Blanca, M. (2019) · Psicothema · doi:10.7334/psicothema2018.202 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“Palabras clave: terapia de aceptación y compromiso, psicoterapia analítica funcional, breve, salud laboral. and conditions (Aguayo, García, & Bermúdez, 2015; Kanter et al., 2017; Mangabeira, Kanter, & del Prette, 2012).”
- Authors
- Mangabeira, V., Kanter, J., & Del Prette, G.
- ORCID
- Kanter, Jonathan
- Venue
- International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 78-89
- ISSN
- 1555-7855 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082415272
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- functional analytic psychotherapy, therapeutic relationship, mechanisms of change, radical behaviorism, interpersonal problems, therapist behavior, behavior change, psychotherapy supervision, therapist-client interaction, therapist self-disclosure, therapist empathy, therapist self-regulation, therapist training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review