Cited by 50Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsBehavioral and Psychological StudiesCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics

Functional Analytic Psychotherapy (FAP): A review of publications from 1990 to 2010.

Open access
Mangabeira, Victor, Kanter, Jonathan, Del Prette, Giovana·2012·International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy

Abstract

Functional Analytic Psychotherapy (FAP), a model for psychotherapy based on radical behaviorism first developed by Kohlenberg and Tsai in 1991 (translated into Portuguese in 2001), proposes that the therapeutic relationship is the primary context for behavioral change in the therapeutic process for clients with interpersonal problems (Kohlenberg & Tsai, 2001; Kohlenberg, Tsai & Kanter, 2009). The authors suggest that everything the therapist needs and can use to help clients through the change process occurs during the session, in the therapeutic relationship. Specifically, FAP encourages the therapist to identify three classes of client clinically relevant behavior (CRB) occurring in session: CRB1, defined as behavioral problems occurring in session; CRB2, defined as behavioral improvements or progress in session, and CRB3, defined as the client's descriptions about the functional controlling variables of his behaviors (both inside and outside the session). FAP systematizes five rules around which the therapist should base treatment, including: (1) Observe the occurrence of CRBs, (2) Evoke CRBs, (3) Reinforce CRB2s, (4) Observe the reinforcing effects of therapist behavior on CRBs, and (5) Provide interpretations about the variables that affect client's behavior (Tsai et al, 2009). Since the FAP book appeared in 1991, many theoretical and empirical papers have appeared. These papers have been quite diverse. For example, several studies have been conducted to demonstrate how…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0100941

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FAP is an effective approach for achieving clinical improvements in different settings and conditions.

    “The empirical evidence shows that FAP is an effective approach for achieving clinical improvements in different settings and conditions (Aguayo, García, & Bermúdez, 2015; Kanter et al., 2017; Mangabeira, Kanter, & del Prette, 2012).”

    From The efficacy of functional-analytic psychotherapy and acceptance and commitment therapy (FACT) for public employees (2019) · cites this paper as Mangabeira, Kanter, & del Prette, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mangabeira, V., Kanter, J., & Del Prette, G.
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy
Published
2012
Volume
7
Issue
2-3
Pages
78-89
ISSN
1555-7855 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082415272
Cited by
50
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Keywords
functional analytic psychotherapy, therapeutic relationship, mechanisms of change, radical behaviorism, interpersonal problems, therapist behavior, behavior change, psychotherapy supervision, therapist-client interaction, therapist self-disclosure, therapist empathy, therapist self-regulation, therapist training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review