Cited by 108Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsBody Contouring and SurgeryCancer survivorship and care

Quality of life in women with lipoedema: a contextual behavioral approach

Dudek, Joanna E., Białaszek, Wojciech, Ostaszewski, Paweł·2016·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Purpose Lipoedema is a chronic, progressive adipose disorder of unknown etiology, often underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed as obesity. It manifests itself with accumulation of the fat in lower parts of the body and associated edema and, due to numerous physical and psychological consequences, affects the quality of life (QOL) of those who suffer. The aim of this study was to investigate the psychological factors that might have an impact on the QOL of women with lipoedema from the contextual behavioral viewpoint.Methods In an Internet-based cross-sectional study, women suffering from lipoedema (N = 120) were asked to fill in questionnaires assessing: symptom severity, QOL (WHOQOL-BREF), satisfaction with life (SWLS), psychological flexibility (Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II), social connectedness (Social Connectedness Scale-Revised) and other psychological factors. The majority of participants were from the USA, the UK, and Australia.Results Multiple hierarchical regression analyses showed that a higher level of QOL was predicted by higher levels of psychological flexibility and social connectedness, while controlling for symptom severity. Higher level of SWL was predicted only by higher level of social connectedness.Conclusions Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with psychological flexibility as the target of change and Functional Analytic Psychotherapy with social connectedness as the target of change might be useful in treating women with lipoedema; however, further research in this area is needed. The authors conclude that psychological and biomedical interventions for women with lipoedema and their QOL merit more attention from researchers and the medical community than is currently received.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11136-015-1080-x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dudek, J. E., Białaszek, W., & Ostaszewski, P.
Affiliations
Uniwersytet SWPS (PL)
Corresponding author
Dudek, Joanna E.
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2015-07-28
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
401-408
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W945894566
Cited by
108
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Body Contouring and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
lipedema, quality of life, women, psychological flexibility, social connectedness, acceptance and commitment therapy, functional analytic psychotherapy, life satisfaction, symptom severity, WHOQOL-BREF
MeSH terms
Adult, Australia, Body Weight, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Stress, Psychological, Internet, Lipedema

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review