Cited by 20Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Mindfulness, mode deactivation, and family therapy: A winning combination for treating adolescents with complex trauma and behavioral problems.

Open access
Swart, Joan, Apsche, Jack·2014·International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy

Abstract

MODE DEACTIVATION THERAPY (MDT) was developed in the 1990s after recognizing the lack of suitable treatment approaches for adolescents with behavioral problems and multiple co-existing conditions, which was often related to childhood trauma. The theoretical basis of MDT was framed on Beck's cognitive theory, Ellis' rational emotive behavior theory, and Piaget's cognitive development theory and concept of schemata. This research study is the most recent in a series that has been reported on since 2002 and were recently synthesized as a meta-analysis (Apsche, Bass, & DiMeo, 2011; Bass & Apsche, 2014; Swart & Apsche, in press). Considered separately and together, these studies consistently provide support of the effectiveness of Mode Deactivation Therapy with the specific target population of male adolescents with behavioral problems. On all accounts, effect sizes were high for target behavioral outcome effects, with statistically significant improvements that outperformed treatment-as-usual control groups by a large margin. This study aims to provide additional support of the efficacy of MDT, thereby reconfirming its value in the treatment for a population that is widely considered as difficult-to-treat. The philosophy of mode deactivation therapy By taking a step back again to the roots of cognitive theory, while blending in psychoanalytic considerations and elements--specifically acceptance and mindfulness--of other third wave approaches such as Dialectical Behavior Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, MDT was developed to overcome inefficiencies that were typically encountered with standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), such as resistance to treatment, ill suitability for adolescents with serious comorbid problems, and short-lived improvements (Apsche & DiMeo, 2012). MDT hypothesized that adolescent externalized problem behavior is the function of internalizing disorders (Bass & Apsche, 2014); acknowledging that each emotional disorder that underlie dysfunctional behavior can be characterized by cognitive content that is specific to its outward expression (Hofmann, Sawyer, & Fang, 2010). The philosophy of modes and schemata are at the crux of the MDT conceptualization. Schemata represent all levels of our experience, at all levels of abstraction. Mode states are mind states that cluster schemas and coping styles into a temporary of being (Young, 2003, p. 37). In fact, already around 1600, Shakespeare proclaimed in Hamlet: There's nothing good or bad but thinking makes it so. The way that thoughts and feelings relate to our core beliefs--our inherent view of ourselves, others, and the world that has helped us cope since childhood--and how they bubble up as behavior, is the essence of understanding and treating behavioral problems. Core beliefs are strongly-held, rigid, and inflexible ideas that developed from childhood and tend to focus on situations and experiences that support and reinforce it. By examining these dysfunctional beliefs that are often outdated in current circumstances, and their relation to unhelpful thoughts and feelings, the MDT methodology directly targets the underlying causes in an accepting and nonjudgmental way. The new insight and awareness is harnessed to strengthen the therapeutic bond and the unique formulation of elements is posited to be the basic seed of the success that MDT has demonstrated with the adolescent population. The original conceptualization of MDT already embodied the philosophy of mindfulness, i.e. present-focused attention and importance of attaching to thoughts and feelings. Also, adolescents are invariably part of a family system, which is often where the origins of distress and dysfunction can be found. Therefore, the principles of mindfulness and family systems theory were also eventually--from 2006 onwards--incorporated into the MDT methodology. According to Bowenian family systems theory: When anxiety is low, we are able to think about our situations and our very existence. …

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0100992

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swart, J., & Apsche, J.
Affiliations
Walden University (US)
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy
Published
2014
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
9-14
ISSN
1555-7855 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153385343
Cited by
20
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
mindfulness, family therapy, adolescents, complex trauma, behavioral problems, externalizing problems, internalizing disorders, cognitive schemas, treatment efficacy, acceptance and commitment therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, third-wave psychotherapy, adolescent boys, treatment resistance, coping styles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review