Cited by 48Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Partner violence, power, and gender differences in South African adolescents’ HIV/sexually transmitted infections risk behaviors.

Open access
Teitelman, Anne M., Jemmott, John B., Bellamy, Scarlett L., Icard, Larry D., O'Leary, Ann, Heeren, G. Anita, Ngwane, Zolani, Ratcliffe, Sarah J.·2016·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Low relationship power and victimization by intimate partner violence (IPV) have been linked to HIV risks among adult and adolescent women. This article examines associations of IPV and relationship power with sexual-risk behaviors and whether the associations differ by gender among South African adolescents. METHOD: Sexual-risk behaviors (multiple partners in past 3 months; condom use at last sex), IPV, and relationship power were collected from 786 sexually experienced adolescents (mean age = 16.9) in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa, during the 54-month follow-up of a HIV/sexually transmitted infection (STI) risk-reduction intervention trial. The data were analyzed with logistic regression models. RESULTS: Adolescent boys were less likely to report condom use at last sex (p = .001) and more likely to report multiple partners (p < .001). A Gender × IPV interaction (p = .002) revealed that as IPV victimization increased, self-reported condom use at last sex decreased among girls, but increased among boys. A Gender × Relationship Power interaction (p = .004) indicated that as relationship power increased, self-reported condom use at last sex increased among girls, but decreased among boys. A Gender × IPV interaction (p = .004) indicated that as IPV victimization increased, self-reports of having multiple partners increased among boys, but not among girls. As relationship power increased, self-reports of having multiple partners decreased irrespective of gender. CONCLUSIONS: HIV risk-reduction interventions and policies should address gender differences in sexual-risk consequences of IPV and relationship power among adolescents and promote gender equity. (PsycINFO Database Record

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/hea0000351

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on dating violence among emerging adults often examines physical or sexual dating violence separately, or fails to distinguish them.

    “research on DV among EAs focuses specifically on PDV or SDV, or does not distinguish the two, despite the potential ramifications for health with regard to sexually transmitted infections (Buelna, Ulloa, & Ulibarri, 2009; Teitelman et al., 2016)”

    From Understanding the Role of Alcohol, Anxiety, and Trait Mindfulness in the Perpetration of Physical and Sexual Dating Violence in Emerging Adults. (2018) · cites this paper as Teitelman et al., 2016

    The paper’s introductory discussion (page unavailable) says that, to the authors’ knowledge, no studies had examined various IPV types alongside sexual-risk behaviors among South African adolescent boys and girls. Its Discussion distinguishes physical and sexual IPV and relates these subtypes to sexual risk. This supports the importance of distinguishing violence types, but not the broader claim about how dating-violence research among emerging adults generally treats them. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Bicchieri C 2015 Norms in the Wild: How to diagnose, measure and change social norms Cambridge, England Cambridge University Press
  2. Connell RW 2014 Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics John Wiley & Sons
  3. Decker M Seage G Hemenway D Raj A Saggurti N Balaiah D Silverman J 2009 Intimate partner violence functions as both a risk marker and risk factor for women’s HIV infection: Findings from Indian husband-wife dyads Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 51 593 600 19421070 PMC3521617
  4. Decker M Silverman J Raj A 2005 Dating violence and sexually transmitted disease/HIV testing and diagnosis among adolescent females Pediatrics 116 e272 e276 16061580
  5. Ehrhardt AA Sawires S McGovern T Peacock D Weston M 2009 Gender, empowerment, and health: what is it? How does it work? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 51 Suppl 3 S96 S105 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181aafd54 19553784 PMC3296368 · DOI
  6. El-Bassel N Gilbert L Witte S Wu E Chang M 2011 Intimate partner violence and HIV among drug-involved women: Contexts linking these two epidemics Challenges and implications for prevention and treatment Substance Use & Misuse 46 295 306 21303249
  7. Flisher AJ Myer L Merais A Lombard C Reddy P 2007 Prevalence and correlates of partner violence among South African adolescents J Child Psychol Psychiatry 48 6 619 627 JCPP1711 [pii] 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01711.x 17537078 · DOI
  8. Foshee VA 1996 Gender differences in adolescent dating abuse prevalence, types and injuries Health Education Research 11 3 275 286 10.1093/Her/11.3.275-A · DOI
  9. Howard D Qiu Y Boekeloo B 2003 Personal and social contextual correlates of adolescent dating violence Journal of Adolescent Health 33 1 9 17 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(03)00061-2 12834992 · DOI
  10. Jemmott JB 3rd Jemmott LS O'Leary A Ngwane Z Icard LD Bellamy SL *Makiwane MB 2010 School-based randomized controlled trial of an HIV/STD risk-reduction intervention for South African adolescents Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 164 10 923 929 164/10/923 [pii] 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.176 20921349 PMC4349685 · DOI
  11. Jemmott JB 3rd Jemmott L O'Leary A Ngwane Z Lewis DA Bellamy SL Icard LD Carty C Heeren GA Tyler JC Makiwane MB Teitelman A 2015 HIV/STI risk-reduction-intervention efficacy with South African adolescents over 54 months Health Psychology 34 6 610 621 25110841 PMC4324387
  12. Jemmott LS Jemmott JB 3rd Ngwane Z Icard LD O'Leary A Gueits L Brawner B 2013 "Let Us Protect Our Future!" A culturally congruent evidenced-based HIV/STD risk-reduction intervention for young South African adolescents Health Education Research 10.1093/her/cyt072 PMC3894663 23962491 · DOI
  13. Jennings J Glass B Parham P Adler N Ellen JM 2004 Sex partner concurrency, geographic context, and adolescent sexually transmitted infections Sex Transm Dis 31 12 734 739 15608588
  14. Jewkes R Morrell R 2010 Gender and sexuality: emerging perspectives from the heterosexual epidemic in South Africa and implications for HIV risk and prevention Journal of the International AIDS Society 13 6 10.1186/1758-2652-13-6 20181124 PMC2828994 · DOI
  15. Jewkes R Nduna M Levin J Jama N Dunkle K Puren A Duvvury N 2008 Impact of stepping stones on incidence of HIV and HSV-2 and sexual behaviour in rural South Africa: cluster randomised controlled trial BMJ 337 a506 18687720 PMC2505093
  16. Kalichman SC Simbayi LC Kagee A Toefy Y Jooste S Cain D Cherry C 2006 Associations of poverty, substance use, and HIV transmission risk behaviors in three South African communities Social Science & Medicine 62 7 1641 1649 S0277-9536(05)00443-0 [pii] 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.021 16213078 · DOI
  17. Neighbors CJ O'Leary A 2003 Responses of Male Inmates to Primary Partner Requests for Condom Use: Effects of Message Content and Domestic Violence History AIDS Education and Prevention 15 93 108 12627746
  18. O'Keefe M Treister L 1998 Victims of dating violence among high school students. Are the predictors different for males and females? Violence Against Women 4 2 195 223 12295441
  19. Pettifor A O'Brien K Macphail C Miller WC Rees H 2009 Early coital debut and associated HIV risk factors among young women and men in South Africa Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 35 2 82 90 10.1363/ifpp.35.082.093508209 pii 19620092 · DOI
  20. Pettifor A Rees HV Kleinschmidt I Steffenson AE MacPhail C Hlongwa-Madikizela L … Padian NS 2005 Young people's sexual health in South Africa: HIV prevalence and sexual behaviors from a nationally representative household survey AIDS 19 14 1525 1534 00002030-200509230-00012 [pii] 16135907
  21. Russell M Cupp PK Jewkes RK Gevers A Mathews C Lefleur-Bellerose C Small J 2014 Intimate Partner Violence Among Adolescents in Cape Town, South Africa Prev Sci 15 3 283 295 10.1007/s11121-013-0405-7 23743796 PMC3841225 · DOI
  22. Sareen J Pagura J Grant B 2009 Is intimate partner violence associated with HIV infection among women in the United States? General Hospital Psychiatry 31 3 274 278 19410107
  23. Silverman J Raj A Clements K 2004 Dating violence and associated sexual risk and pregnancy among adolescent girls in the United States Pediatrics 114 e220 e225 15286260
  24. Spencer GA Bryant SA 2000 Dating violence: a comparison of rural, suburban, and urban teens Journal of Adolescent Health 27 5 302 305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(00)00125-7 11044701 · DOI
  25. Tanser F Barnighausen T Hund L Garnett GP McGrath N Newell ML 2011 Effect of concurrent sexual partnerships on rate of new HIV infections in a high-prevalence, rural South African population: a cohort study Lancet 378 9787 247 255 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60779-4 21763937 PMC3141142 · DOI
  26. Teitelman AM Ratcliffe SJ Morales-Aleman MM Sullivan CM 2008 Sexual relationship power,intimate partner violence,and condom use among minority urban girls Journal of Interpersonal Violence 23 12 1694 1712 18349344 PMC3677854
  27. Teitelman AM Ratcliffe SJ Dichter ME Sullivan CM 2008 Recent and past intimate partner abuse and HIV risk among young women J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 37 2 219 227 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00231.xJOGN231 pii PMC3677848 18336447 · DOI
  28. Teitelman AM Tennille J Bohinski JM Jemmott LS Jemmott JB 2011 Unwanted unprotected sex: Condom coercion by male partners and self-silencing of condom negotiation among adolescent girls Advances in Nursing Science 34 3 243 259 10.1097/ANS.0b013e31822723a3 21822072 · DOI
  29. Varga CA 2003 How gender roles influence sexual and reproductive health among South African adolescents Stud Fam Plann 34 3 160 172 14558319
  30. Vasilenko SA Lanza ST 2014 Predictors of multiple sexual partners from adolescence through young adulthood J Adolesc Health 55 4 491 497 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.12.025 24561033 PMC4139487 · DOI
  31. Wingood GM DiClemente RJ 1997 The effects of an abusive primary partner on the condom use and sexual negotiation practices of African-American women American Journal of Public Health 87 1016 1018 9224187 PMC1380941
  32. Wingood GM DiClemente RJ 2002 Application of the Theory of Gender and Power to Examine HIV-Related Exposures, Risk Factors, and Effective Interventions for Women Health Education & Behavior 27 5 539 565 11009126
  33. Wolfe DA Scott K Reitzel-Jaffe D Wekerle C Grasley C Straatman A 2001 Development and validation of the Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory Psychological Assessment 13 277 293 11433803
  34. Zhang J Jemmott JB 3rd Jemmott LS In Press Mediation and moderation of an efficacious theory-based abstinence-only intervention for African American adolescents Health Psychology http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/hea0000244 PMC5862040 26214076 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teitelman, A. M., Jemmott, J. B., Bellamy, S. L., Icard, L. D., O'Leary, A., Heeren, G. A., Ngwane, Z., & Ratcliffe, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Temple University (US)
  • Haverford College (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2016-07
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
751-760
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2342730176
Cited by
48
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH065867 and K01 MH080649)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30 AI045008)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
intimate partner violence, power in relationships, gender differences, adolescent sexual risk behavior, condom use, multiple sexual partners, HIV risk, sexually transmitted infections, adolescent boys, adolescent girls, gender equity, South Africa
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Power, Psychological, Risk-Taking, Sexual Behavior, Sex Characteristics, Sexual Partners, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, South Africa, Spouse Abuse, HIV Infections, Safe Sex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review