Cited by 32Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Treatment

Pain resilience and catastrophizing combine to predict functional restoration program outcomes.

France, Christopher R., Ysidron, Dominic W., Slepian, P. Maxwell, French, Douglas J., Evans, R. Thomas·2020·Health Psychology

Abstract

Objective Whereas decades of research have been devoted to psychological factors that confer vulnerability to disability and other negative outcomes in the face of chronic pain, recent studies have begun to emphasize psychological characteristics that contribute to enhanced adaptation and better clinical outcomes. Accordingly, the present study was conducted as a longitudinal assessment of the predictive utility of pain resilience and pain catastrophizing as indicators of clinical outcomes among patients receiving a standardized treatment for chronic pain. Method Using an observational design, analyses were conducted on measures of pain resilience, pain catastrophizing, quality of life, and clinical pain administered to 149 patients upon admission and prior to discharge from an 8-week outpatient functional restoration program. Hierarchical linear regressions were conducted to predict improvement in physical and mental health quality of life and clinical pain intensity at discharge based on individual differences in admission levels of pain-related catastrophizing and resilience. Results Results of the primary analyses indicated that pain catastrophizing and pain resilience independently predicted physical and mental health quality-of-life outcomes at discharge but did not significantly predict clinical pain intensity. Specifically, higher baseline pain resilience was associated with better quality-of-life outcomes, whereas higher baseline catastrophizing was associated with p…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/hea0000877

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
France, C. R., Ysidron, D. W., Slepian, P. M., French, D. J., & Evans, R. T.
Affiliations
Ohio University (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2020-07
Volume
39
Issue
7
Pages
573-579
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W3018552017
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
pain resilience, pain catastrophizing, chronic pain, functional restoration program, quality of life, pain intensity, treatment outcome prediction, outpatient rehabilitation
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Catastrophization, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review