Cited by 122Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Help-seeking and needs of male victims of intimate partner violence in Portugal.

Open access
Machado, Andreia, Hines, Denise, Matos, Marlene·2016·Psychology of Men & Masculinity

Abstract

A large body of research clearly indicates that men are victims of intimate partner violence (IPV). However, in Portugal, the phenomenon of male victims of IPV remains hidden and is not a target of research, public policy, or social attention. This exploratory study analyzed the prevalence of victimization, help-seeking behaviors, and needs of 89 men who defined themselves as victims of IPV. Men reported that they had been the victims of at least 1 abusive behavior by their current or former female partner. Psychological violence, followed by physical and sexual violence, was the most frequently reported experience. The majority of the men did not seek help because of difficulty in self-identifying as victims, shame, and distrust of the support system. When they did seek help, informal sources, such as friends and family, were used more often than formal sources. In terms of formal support, victims used health professionals and social/victim support services more than any other type. The male victims evaluated the formal resources (e.g., social/victim support services, police, justice system) as unhelpful. A mediation model showed that both frequency of physical violence and self-reported impact of IPV predicted help-seeking, with impact of IPV partially mediating the association between physical IPV and help-seeking. The results indicate the difficulties that men have in recognizing themselves as victims of abuse, their reluctance to seek help, the barriers they face, and their heterogeneous and idiosyncratic needs. The implications regarding masculinity, the help-seeking system, and public policy are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/men0000013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 122

Authors
Machado, A., Hines, D., & Matos, M.
Affiliations
  • Clark University (US)
  • University of Minho (PT)
Venue
Psychology of Men & Masculinity
Published
2016-07
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
255-264
ISSN
  • 1524-9220 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-151X
OpenAlex
W2461225507
Cited by
122
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
9.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Psychology of Men & Masculinity (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/76309/2011)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
intimate partner violence, male victims, help-seeking, victim needs, psychological violence, physical violence, sexual violence, shame, victim identification, informal support, victim support, help-seeking barriers, mediation model, masculinity, Portugal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review