Organizational Support, Job Resources, Soldiers’ Motivational Profiles, Work Engagement, and Affect
Abstract
The authors examined the relationships between soldiers’ motivational profiles and work correlates. Results showed that the profiles differentially related to perceived organizational support and work engagement in both samples, as well as to communication, supervisor support, and positive and negative affect in Sample 2. Specifically, soldiers with the highest autonomous motivation scores displayed the highest levels of perceived organizational support and work engagement. Moreover, the highest levels of autonomous motivation were associated with the highest levels of communication, supervisor support, and positive affect. Finally, soldiers with low to moderate levels of autonomous motivation reported higher levels of negative affect than those characterized by high autonomous motivation scores. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When considering studies that considered a broader set of behavioral regulations, despite some variations, results seem to converge on profiles characterized by: (a) high autonomous motivation and low controlled motivation and amotivation (HAu-LC-LAm), (b) high autonomous and controlled motivations and low amotivation (HAu-HC-LAm), (c) low autonomous motivation and high controlled motivation and a
“Still, when we consider these studies as well as those in which a broader set of behavioral regulations has been considered (Gillet, Becker et al., 2017;Gillet et al., 2018;Graves et al., 2015;Howard et al., 2016;Jansen in de Wal et al., 2014;Moran et al., 2012), despite some variations, the results seem to converge on profiles characterized by: (a) high levels of autonomous motivation, and low”
From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Gillet, Becker et al., 2017
Person-centered studies have shown that controlled forms of motivation may sometimes be associated with positive outcomes, but only when accompanied by high levels of autonomous motivation.
“Even more precisely, person-centered studies have shown that controlled forms of motivation may sometimes be associated with positive outcomes, but only when accompanied by high levels of autonomous motivation (e.g., Gillet, Becker et al., 2017;Moran et al., 2012), underscoring the importance of studying behavioral regulations in combination.”
From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Gillet, Becker et al., 2017
Some of these studies have also supported the importance of differentiating among more specific types of regulation by identifying profiles characterized by differentiated levels of introjected and external regulations.
“Some of these studies (Gillet, Becker et al., 2017;Moran et al., 2012) have also supported the importance of differentiating among more specific types of regulation by the identification of profiles characterized by differentiated levels of introjected and external regulations.”
From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Gillet, Becker et al., 2017
The Value-Reward Self-Driven profile shares similarities with the Moderate Autonomous/Introjected/External profile identified by Gillet et al. (2018), with the Moderate profile identified by Gillet, Becker et al. (2017) and Moran et al. (2012), and with the Moderately Motivated profile identified by Jansen in de Wal et al. (2014).
“The Value-Reward Self-Driven profile was found to share similarities with the Moderate Autonomous/Introjected/External profile identified by Gillet et al. (2018), with the Moderate profile identified by Gillet, Becker et al. (2017) and Moran et al. (2012), and with the Moderately Motivated profile identified by Jansen in de Wal et al. (2014).”
From A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees (2020) · cites this paper as Gillet, Becker et al. (2017)
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194 · see citing works
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210 · see citing works
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 6,982 · see citing works
Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation
Vallerand, R. J. (1997) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60019-2 · Cited by 3,198 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…shows some limitations as a variety of motives (e.g., money, pleasure) are typically at play in life settings and different motivational profiles may thus exist in the work context (Vallerand, 1997), which variable-centered approach does This article was published Online First May 18, 2017.”
BackgroundGagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., Bellerose, J., Benabou, C., Chemolli, E., Güntert, S. T., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2013.877892 · Cited by 1,051 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward an Improved Understanding of Work Motivation Profiles
Tóth‐Király, I., Morin, A. J. S., Bőthe, B., Rigó, A., & Orosz, G. (2021) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12256 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees
Gillet, N., Morin, A. J. S., Ndiaye, A., Colombat, P., & Fouquereau, E. (2020) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12322 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Gillet, N., Becker, C., Lafrenière, M.-A., Huart, I., & Fouquereau, E.
- Affiliations
- Université de Tours (FR)
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Gillet, Nicolas
- Venue
- Military Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-06-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 418-433
- ISSN
- 0899-5605 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7876
- OpenAlex
- W2616294043
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 8.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Military Psychology (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Keywords
- military personnel, motivational profiles, autonomous motivation, perceived organizational support, work engagement, positive affect, negative affect, supervisor support, communication, job resources
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review