The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advances in recovery research: What have we learned? What should be done next?
Abstract
that differentiates between recovery as a process and recovery as an outcome. Empirical studies have shown that recovery activities (e.g., physical exercise) and recovery experiences (e.g., psychological detachment from work) are negatively associated with strain symptoms (e.g., exhaustion) and positively associated with positive well-being indicators (e.g., vigor). Recovery activities and recovery experiences suffer when employees face a high level of job stressors. Psychological mechanisms underlying recovery seem to be similar across different temporal recovery settings (e.g., work breaks, free evenings, vacations) and seem to be enhanced in natural environments. Intervention studies have pointed to a diverse set of strategies for how everyday job-stress recovery can be supported. This article discusses 5 avenues for future research, with a particular focus on individual and contextual factors that may influence recovery as well as highlighting more complex temporal patterns than those uncovered in previous research. (PsycINFO Database Record
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Extensive time spent engaged in work activities suggests that faculty may have little time to psychologically or physically disengage from work, a key element necessary for recovery (Sonnentag, 2012; Sonnentag et al., 2017).”
From Faculty Time Expenditure Across Research, Teaching, and Service: Do Gender Differences Persist? (2023) · cites this paper as Sonnentag et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“Sonnentag et al. (2017) concluded in an overview article that psychological detachment and relaxation exhibit the most consistent evidence.”
From Learning how to recover from stress: Results from an internet-based randomized controlled pilot trial (2023) · cites this paper as Sonnentag et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“Empirical studies have shown that leisure and other nonwork activities, such as physical exercise, recovery experiences, and mastery experiences can elevate an individual's energy level (ten Brummelhuis and Bakker, 2012; ten Brummelhuis and Trougakos, 2014; see Sonnentag et al., 2017 for a review)”
From Work hard or play hard: the effect of leisure crafting on opportunity recognition and venture performance (2023) · cites this paper as Sonnentag et al., 2017
Citations
Cites
Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 · Cited by 15,744
The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework
Kaplan, S. (1995) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 · Cited by 6,923
Protective and Damaging Effects of Stress Mediators
McEwen, B. S. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199801153380307 · Cited by 6,733
Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80184-7 · Cited by 5,990
Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443 · Cited by 3,638
Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019364 · Cited by 3,335
The cognitive benefits of interacting with nature.
Berman, M. G., Jonides, J., & Kaplan, S. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x · Cited by 2,535
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204 · Cited by 2,133
Self-citationTracking restoration in natural and urban field settings
Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(02)00109-3 · Cited by 2,118
A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments
Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L. M., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-456 · Cited by 1,993
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pega, F., Náfrádi, B., Momen, N. C., Ujita, Y., Streicher, K. N., Prüss‐Üstün, A., Descatha, A., Driscoll, T., Fischer, F. M., Godderis, L., et al. (2021) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106595 · Cited by 433
Recovery from Work: Advancing the Field Toward the Future
Sonnentag, S., Cheng, B. H., & Parker, S. L. (2021) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091355 · Cited by 461
Self-citationSonnentag, S. (2018) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.002 · Cited by 484
Self-citationLeaving Work at Work: A Meta-Analysis on Employee Recovery From Work
Steed, L. B., Swider, B. W., Keem, S., & Liu, J. T. (2019) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206319864153 · Cited by 299
Daily micro-breaks and job performance: General work engagement as a cross-level moderator.
Kim, S., Park, Y., & Headrick, L. (2018) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000308 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Sonnentag, S., Venz, L., & Casper, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Mannheim (DE)
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational Health Psychology
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 365-380
- ISSN
- 1076-8998 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1307
- OpenAlex
- W2599271079
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 148
- Citations by year
- 2026: 62 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 55.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Occupational Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Keywords
- recovery, occupational stress, recovery activities, recovery experiences, psychological detachment, rest breaks, holidays, natural environment, occupational stressors, exhaustion, vigor, well-being, recovery interventions
- MeSH terms
- Occupational Stress, Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Leisure Activities, Surveys and Questionnaires, Relaxation, Work, Workload
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
