Cited by 12Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesAgriculture and Farm SafetyHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

“I’ve given up”: Biopsychosocial factors preceding farmer suicide in Wisconsin.

Kohlbeck, Sara A., Quinn, Katherine, deRoon-Cassini, Terri, Hargarten, Stephen, Nelson, David, Cassidy, Laura·2023·American Journal of Orthopsychiatry

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that individuals working in certain occupations may be at increased risk for suicide. While occupation is an individual-level factor, one's work is situated in organizations, communities, and societies that are impacted by policies and systems. Analysis of existing data has identified that farmers are among those with elevated rates of suicide. This qualitative study reports themes that capture the experience of farmers prior to their death by suicide in Wisconsin. This retrospective qualitative study analyzed data from the Wisconsin Violent Death Reporting System. Data on farmer suicides that occurred in Wisconsin between 2004 and 2018 were accessed. Qualitative analyses followed an inductive thematic analysis approach. All study activities were approved by the institutional review board at the Medical College of Wisconsin. Between 2004 and 2018, 190 farmers died by suicide in Wisconsin. Five themes were identified in the qualitative analysis: "rugged individualism" clashes with a need to rely on others, interpersonal loss causes intense emotional pain and suffering, financial stress and strain overwhelm Wisconsin farmers, farmers are providers for families and communities, and alcohol and firearms are a lethal combination. Farmers who died by suicide in Wisconsin were facing significant stressors at the time of their death, many of which were not directly related to verifiable diagnosed mental illness. These circumstances varied, from physical health issues to financial stressors, to emotional pain from interpersonal conflict, and to access to lethal means. This study provides evidence calling for a public health solution to this issue, through changes at the policy, systems, and cultural levels. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ort0000662

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kohlbeck, S. A., Quinn, K., deRoon-Cassini, T., Hargarten, S., Nelson, D., & Cassidy, L.
Affiliations
Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Venue
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
Published
2023
Volume
93
Issue
2
Pages
131-143
ISSN
  • 0002-9432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0025
OpenAlex
W4312095720
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Orthopsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture and Farm Safety
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
farmer suicide, occupational suicide risk, biopsychosocial factors, financial stress, interpersonal loss, rugged individualism, family responsibilities, suicide prevention policy
MeSH terms
Farmers, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Suicide, Wisconsin, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review