The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A history of the community mental health movement and individuals with serious mental illness: A vision for the future
Abstract
The history of the development of the Global Alliance for Behavioral Health and Social Justice was founded on understanding the social determinants of mental health and society and the necessity for multiple disciplines to organize advocacy for human rights and social justice. This led way to a wide cross-section of disciplines working together to engage at the policy level, in legislation, and within community settings as the Community Mental Health Movement developed and made a path for the reformation of many forms within the mental health field. This article reviews some of that interesting history and the importance of understanding those fundamental roots as we also look at the future for what is next in advocacy, social justice action, and policy directions for advancing the lives of those with serious mental illness, who face some of the most oppressive forms of marginalization and rejection of human rights and citizenship. This article will outline social justice action agendas for the organization and diverse collaborative fields to pursue as we embark upon the future and envision the full rights of citizenship for those with serious mental illness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social forces that marginalize or constrain activity participation for people with severe mental illness must be addressed in any intervention approach that purports to focus on supporting community inclusion and quality of life.
“With the growing understanding of the social forces that marginalize or constrain activity participation for people with severe mental illness, these must be addressed in any intervention approach that purports to focus on supporting community inclusion and quality of life (89).”
From Contributions of a time use perspective in community mental health practice: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [89]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Contributions of a time use perspective in community mental health practice: a scoping review
Fossey, E., Doroud, N., Harvey, C. A., Dun, C., Hitch, D., Farnworth, L., & Krupa, T. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1461705 · Cited by 5
The Impact of Exercise on Teacher Satisfaction and Retention
Wilkens, S. A., & Milla, C. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6157-4.ch012
Baziliansky, S., & Sowan, W. (2026) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008066.2026.2634586
Cembrano, P., & Míguez, G. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-70581-6_583-1
Metadata
- Authors
- Carr, E. R.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Carr, Erika R.
- ORCID
- Carr, Erika R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 380-391
- ISSN
- 0002-9432 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-0025
- OpenAlex
- W4396580639
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Orthopsychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- State of Connecticut
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Keywords
- community mental health movement, severe mental illness, social justice, human rights, social determinants of mental health, advocacy, mental health policy, citizenship, marginalization
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Humans, Human Rights, Mental Health, Social Justice, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review