Cited by 76Psychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research TopicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Dimensional structure of the Spanish version of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) in adolescents and young adults

Ortuño-Sierra, Javier, Santarén-Rosell, Marta, de Albéniz, Alicia Pérez, Fonseca-Pedrero, Eduardo·2015·Psychological Assessment

Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to examine the dimensional structure of the Spanish version of the PANAS, using a large sample of adolescents and young adults (N = 1103, age range 14 to 23). Furthermore, measurement invariance across gender and educational level was tested. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that a bifactor model and a 3-factor model Positive Affect (PA), Negative Affect (NA) Upset, and NA Afraid (PA and NA uncorrelated) provided the best fit to the data. Multigroup confirmatory factor analyses showed that the 3-factor model of the PANAS had strong measurement invariance across gender and educational level. Results showed statistically significant differences in the latent mean scores. University students scored higher than adolescents in PA, NA Upset, and NA Afraid. Men scored higher than women in PA. The PANAS scores also showed acceptable internal consistency scores (range from .80 to .86). The results found support for the PANAS as a brief and useful tool for the screening PA and NA in adolescents and young adult's populations. These findings hold implications for the study and use of the PANAS in nonclinical populations. Future studies should test measurement invariance of the PANAS scores across cultures. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pas0000107

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ortuño-Sierra, J., Santarén-Rosell, M., de Albéniz, A. P., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E.
Affiliations
Universidad de La Rioja (ES)
Venue
Psychological Assessment
Published
2015-09
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
e1-e9
ISSN
  • 1040-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-134X
OpenAlex
W2323082987
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
PANAS, Spanish translation, dimensional structure, positive affect, negative affect, bifactor model, measurement invariance, adolescents, young adults, gender differences, educational attainment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Fear, Female, Humans, Language, Male, Models, Theoretical, Psychometrics, Spain, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review