CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18Virtual Reality Applications and ImpactsDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningParanormal Experiences and Beliefs

Conjuring up the departed in virtual reality: The good, the bad, and the potentially ugly.

Stein, Jan-Philipp·2021·Psychology of Popular Media
DOI 10.1037/ppm0000315
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ppm0000315

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Virtual reality environments could offer opportunities for interacting with deceased individuals.

    “Taking things even one step further, virtual reality environments could offer opportunities for-at least seemingly-interacting with deceased individuals (Stein, 2021):”

    From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Stein, 2021

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stein, J.-P.
Corresponding author
Stein, Jan-Philipp
ORCID
Stein, Jan-Philipp
Venue
Psychology of Popular Media
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2021-10
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
505-510
ISSN
  • 2689-6567 (ISSN-L)
  • 2689-6575
DOI
10.1037/ppm0000315
OpenAlex
W3142700667
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology of Popular Media (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
Keywords
virtual reality, digital afterlife

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review