Cited by 352Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental HealthPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interventions targeting mental health self-stigma: A review and comparison.

Open access
Yanos, Philip T., Lucksted, Alicia, Drapalski, Amy L., Roe, David, Lysaker, Paul·2015·Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: With growing awareness of the impact of mental illness self-stigma, interest has arisen in the development of interventions to combat it. The present article briefly reviews and compares interventions targeting self-stigma to clarify the similarities and important differences between the interventions. METHOD: We conducted a narrative review of published literature on interventions targeting self-stigma. RESULTS: Six intervention approaches (Healthy Self-Concept, Self-Stigma Reduction Program, Ending Self-Stigma, Narrative Enhancement and Cognitive Therapy, Coming Out Proud, and Anti-Stigma Photo-Voice Intervention) were identified and are discussed, and data is reviewed on format, group-leader backgrounds, languages, number of sessions, primary mechanisms of action, and the current state of data on their efficacy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: We conclude with a discussion of common elements and important distinctions between the interventions and a consideration of which interventions might be best suited to particular populations or settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/prj0000100

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 24 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–352 of 352

Metadata

Authors
Yanos, P. T., Lucksted, A., Drapalski, A. L., Roe, D., & Lysaker, P.
Affiliations
  • City University of New York (US)
  • VA Capitol Health Care Network (US)
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
Published
2015-06
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
171-178
ISSN
  • 1095-158X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-3126
OpenAlex
W2138011063
Cited by
351
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7
FWCI
22.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH0094310, R01MH090036-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
stigma reduction interventions, intervention efficacy, mechanism of action
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Peer Group, Psychotherapy, Group, Self Concept, Stereotyping, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review