Cited by 29Mental Health and Patient InvolvementSchizophrenia research and treatmentFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Self‐initiated helping behaviors and recovery in severe mental illness: implications for work, volunteerism, and peer support

Open access
Firmin, Ruth L., Luther, Lauren, Lysaker, Paul H., Salyers, Michelle P.·2015·Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite recent interest in peer support workers in recovery-oriented services, little is known about how helping behaviors may affect recovery from severe mental illness outside of formal peer support roles. The current study is a mixed-methods approach to understanding naturalistic helping behaviors and their relationship with recovery outcomes among persons with serious mental illness. METHODS: Forty-six participants with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders completed a narrative interview and standardized measures of recovery, symptoms, hope, patient activation, quality of life, medication adherence, insight, and illness management. Interviews were coded using emergent, thematic analysis. The study compared individuals who (unprompted) mentioned helping behaviors in their interview to those who did not on recovery-related outcomes. RESULTS: Sixteen participant narratives (35%) described self-initiated helping behaviors. Themes included a desire to tell others their story, teach others recovery-promoting skills, become a peer support worker, give back to society, and be more active family members. Those who discussed helping others in narrative interviews scored significantly higher on measures of recovery, illness management, patient activation, hope, quality of life, medication adherence, and insight and scored significantly lower on measures of overall symptoms, as well as negative, positive, and cognitive symptoms, than did those who did not discuss helping behaviors. The groups did not differ on hostility or emotional discomfort symptoms. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Findings indicate associations between helping others and improved scores on measures of recovery outcomes. Potential implications include focusing on meaningful work/volunteerism and expanding roles for peer support in recovery-oriented services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/prj0000145

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Firmin, R. L., Luther, L., Lysaker, P. H., & Salyers, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
Published
2015-12
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
336-341
ISSN
  • 1095-158X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-3126
OpenAlex
W2467769105
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Veterans Affairs (IIR 08-324 and IAC 05-254)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
schizophrenia spectrum disorders, peer support, peer support workers, volunteering, meaningful work, patient activation, hope, quality of life, medication adherence, insight, illness management, symptom severity, family involvement
MeSH terms
Peer Influence, Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Female, Helping Behavior, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Social Support, United States, Volunteers, Treatment Outcome, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review