Cited by 30Mental Health Treatment and AccessMental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychology and Mental Health

Subtle ways of stigmatization among professionals: the subjective experience of consumers and their family members.

Amsalem, Doron, Hasson-Ohayon, Ilanit, Gothelf, Doron, Roe, David·2018·Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Subtle expressions of stigmata or microaggressions consist of insensitive and demeaning remarks or statements which negate an individual's perception of their reality. They are differentiated from more traditional and overt forms of discrimination in that they are often voiced by well-intentioned individuals who are unaware of the negative underpinnings and potentially harmful effects of their comments. This study aimed to explore the subjective experience of stigma and macroaggression among consumers and their family members during their encounters with mental health care providers. METHOD: Sixteen individuals who were recently diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and 15 of their family members were interviewed. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using grounded theory. RESULTS: Three major forms of subtle stigma expressions or microaggressions were identified: that lived experience is not relevant, people diagnosed with a psychosis have no hope for recovery, and sharing and discussing professional knowledge is not necessary. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Encounters with mental health care providers include subtle conveyance of stigmatizing messages that are well recognized as a barrier to recovery. Psychoeducational interventions for staff that emphasize the importance of lived experience and sharing professional knowledge are recommended, as well as further studying the subtle ways of stigmatization among staff. (PsycINFO Database Record

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/prj0000310

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinicians can express stigma subtly and unintendedly to people with psychosis.

    “Clinicians can express stigma subtly and unintendedly to people with psychosis (76).”

    From Making meaning of trauma in psychosis (2023) · cites this paper as [76]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amsalem, D., Hasson-Ohayon, I., Gothelf, D., & Roe, D.
Venue
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
Published
2018-09
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
163-168
ISSN
  • 1095-158X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-3126
OpenAlex
W2872265199
Cited by
30
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
microaggressions, macroaggressions, mental health care providers, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, psychosis, family members, lived experience, professional knowledge sharing, barriers to recovery, psychoeducational intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aggression, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Qualitative Research, Young Adult, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review