Cited by 15Psychiatric care and mental health servicesHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout Research

Factors that affect quality of care among mental health providers: Focusing on job stress and resources.

Open access
Fukui, Sadaaki, Salyers, Michelle P., Morse, Gary, Rollins, Angela L.·2021·Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

Abstract

Resources on the job may be particularly important for improved person-centered care, and lowering job stress may help reduce discordant care. The current study suggests the need for the mental health organizations to attend to both job stress and resources for providers to improve the quality of care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/prj0000469

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decrease in job demands and increase in job resources are both necessary to enable MHWs to provide high quality, person-centred care.

    “However, decrease in JDs and increase in JRs are both necessary to enable MHWs to provide high quality, person-centred care [147].”

    From Interventions to address empathy-based stress in mental health workers: A scoping review and research agenda (2024) · cites this paper as [147]

    The Discussion (‘Factors for person-centered care’) associates better person-centered care with job resources, especially organizational support and role clarity. It says the association with emotional exhaustion was no longer significant after resources were added to the model. The Abstract distinguishes improved person-centered care from reduced discordant care, which may benefit from lower job stress; it does not establish that reducing job demands and increasing resources are both necessary for person-centered care. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Acker GM (2003). Role conflict and ambiguity: Do they predict burnout among mental health service providers?. Social Work in Mental Health, 1(3), 63– 80.
  2. Bakker AB, & Costa PL (2014). Chronic job burnout and daily functioning: A theoretical analysis. Burnout Research, 1(3), 112– 119.
  3. Bakker AB, & Demerouti E (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309– 328.
  4. Dreison K (2018). Predicting mental health provider response to BRATHE, a Burnout intervention (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
  5. Eisenberger R, Huntington R, Hutchison S, & Sowa D (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied psychology, 71(3), 500– 507.
  6. Enders CK (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford press.
  7. Institute of Medicine (2001). Crossing the Quality Chasm Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
  8. Institute of Medicine (2006). Improving the quality of health care for mental and substance-use conditions: Quality chasm series. Washington DC: National Academy Press. 20669433
  9. Lyons TF. (1971) Role clarity, need for clarity, satisfaction, tension, and withdrawal. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6(1), 99– 110.
  10. Maslach C, Jackson SE, & Leiter MP (1996). Maslach Burnout Inventory. (3rd.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  11. Muthén LK, & Muthén BO (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
  12. Ogbonnaya C, Tillman CJ, & Gonzalez K (2018). Perceived Organizational Support in Health Care: The Importance of Teamwork and Training for Employee Well-Being and Patient Satisfaction. Group & Organization Management, 43(3), 475– 503.
  13. Spector PE & Fox S. (2003). Reducing subjectivity in the assessment of the job environment: Development of the Factual Autonomy Scale (FAS). Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(4), 417– 432.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fukui, S., Salyers, M. P., Morse, G., & Rollins, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University (US)
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
  • Places For People (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
Published
2021-09
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
204-211
ISSN
  • 1095-158X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-3126
OpenAlex
W3126322259
Cited by
15
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34 MH104201)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
quality of care, mental health professionals, occupational stress, organizational resources, person-centred care, psychiatric rehabilitation, mental health organizations
MeSH terms
Occupational Stress, Community Mental Health Centers, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Quality of Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review