The New Identity Theft: Perceptions of Cultural Appropriation in Intergroup Contexts
Open accessAbstract
Cultural appropriation has been described and discussed within academic and everyday discourse, but little research has examined its role in the psychological context of intergroup relations. We sought to examine whether minority and majority group members (i.e., Black and White Americans) would differentially judge instances of cultural exchange as cultural appropriation. Five experiments (3 were preregistered on OSF) using a variety of potential cases of cultural appropriation demonstrated that Black participants were more likely than White participants to view these incidents as appropriation when they involved White perpetrators appropriating Black culture (vs. scenarios of Black perpetrators appropriating White culture), an effect mediated by distinctiveness threat. Black (vs. White) participants were also more likely to perceive White actors who appropriate Black culture as harmful and as intentional. In Study 4, explicit manipulation of distinctiveness threat eliminated the participant race effect: Perceivers viewed White perpetrators as more appropriative than Black perpetrators. When actors were portrayed as using either an ingroup or outgroup cultural product (Study 5), participants perceived use of an outgroup cultural product as more appropriative. Studies 3-5 were preregistered on OSF. This research illuminates how group-based status interacts with and adds to perpetrator prototypically to influence perceptions of cultural appropriation, distinguishes perception…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Consumer appreciation of cultural difference is increasingly being challenged by the discourse of cultural appropriation that constitutes the responsibilized consumer subject.
“More and more, the consumer appreciation of cultural difference is being challenged by a countervailing set of ideas: the discourse of cultural appropriation that constitutes the responsibilized consumer subject.”
From Between Cultural Appreciation and Cultural Appropriation: Self-Authorizing the Consumption of Cultural Difference (2024) · cites this paper as Mosley and Biernat 2021
As the cultural appropriation discourse filters into popular culture and public discussions, individuals become constituted as responsibilized consumer subjects with respect to cultural appropriation.
“The outcome of the cultural appropriation discourse is that, as it increasingly filters from academic literature into popular culture and public discussions (Finkelstein and Rios 2022; Mosley and Biernat 2021), individuals become constituted as responsibilized consumer subjects (Giesler and Veresiu 2014) with respect to the issue of cultural appropriation.”
From Between Cultural Appreciation and Cultural Appropriation: Self-Authorizing the Consumption of Cultural Difference (2024) · cites this paper as Mosley and Biernat 2021
Cites
James, D. (2004) · Ethnicity & Health · doi:10.1080/1355785042000285375 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cruz, A. G. B., Seo, Y., & Scaraboto, D. (2024) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucad022 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
“…(hooks 2006; Pe ~ naloza 2001; Root 1996; Skrbis and Woodward 2007; Veresiu and Giesler 2018), these critiques have only recently filtered into more pervasive public discussions and emerged as a significant concern for consumers (Finkelstein and Rios 2022; Mosley and Biernat 2021; web appendix A).”
BackgroundFinkelstein, S. R., & Rios, K. (2022) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21728 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mosley, A. J., & Biernat, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 308-331
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W3049322607
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1451148)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- cultural appropriation, intergroup relations, Black and White Americans, perpetrator perceptions, identity theft, cultural exchange
- MeSH terms
- Black or African American, Humans, Minority Groups, Perception, White People, Racism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review