You have to follow through: Attaining behavioral change goals predicts volitional personality change.
Published version of a preprint
Abstract
Prior research has found that people's desires to change their personality traits predict corresponding subsequent trait growth over time. However, few studies have examined the processes through which people can volitionally change their personality traits. Thus, it remains unclear whether merely desiring change predicts trait growth or whether actively pursuing change is necessary. The present study was a 15-week intensive longitudinal design that tested whether engaging in trait-typical behaviors predicted trait change. Participants provided self-report ratings of their personality traits and were able to freely accept and complete weekly "challenges"-prewritten behavioral goals that would pull their thoughts, feelings, and behaviors in line with their desired traits. Results indicated that merely accepting behavioral challenges did not predict trait changes. Rather, only actually completing challenges (i.e., performing trait-typical behaviors) predicted trait change over time. Thus, merely wanting to change does not appear to be sufficient to evoke trait growth; successfully changing one's personality traits may require actively and successfully implementing behaviors to change oneself. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People can change their personality when they have the desire to change and actively pursue the goal of change.
“Hudson et al. (2019) found that people can change their personality when they have the desire to change and actively pursue the goal of change.”
From Self and identity in personality psychology (2021) · cites this paper as Hudson et al. (2019)
There are interindividual differences in people's desire to change (aspects of) their personality.
“Recently, Hudson and colleagues (2019; see also Hudson & Fraley, 2015) have shown that there are interindividual differences in people's desire to change (aspects of) their personality.”
From Can Playfulness be Stimulated? A Randomised Placebo‐Controlled Online Playfulness Intervention Study on Effects on Trait Playfulness, Well‐Being, and Depression (2021) · cites this paper as Hudson et al., 2019
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 42 · Cited by 169
- Authors
- Hudson, N. W., Briley, D. A., Chopik, W. J., & Derringer, J.
- Affiliations
- Southern Methodist University (US)
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Michigan State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 117
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 839-857
- ISSN
- 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2898389145
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 18.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Keywords
- personality change, behavioral objectives, behavior change, behavioral problems, goal pursuit, self-regulation, intensive longitudinal design
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Character, Female, Goals, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Motivation, Personality Disorders, Social Adjustment, Volition, Self Report, Sociological Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review