Cited by 67Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionHumor Studies and ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Can Playfulness be Stimulated? A Randomised Placebo‐Controlled Online Playfulness Intervention Study on Effects on Trait Playfulness, Well‐Being, and Depression

Open access
Proyer, René T., Gander, Fabian, Brauer, Kay, Chick, Garry·2021·Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being

Abstract

Background: While there are numerous applications of play‐based interventions, there is little research on playfulness‐based interventions. We applied interventions that aim at stimulating playfulness and test effects on happiness and depressive symptoms. Method: In a randomised placebo‐controlled online intervention, N = 533 participants were assigned to one of three 1‐week playfulness conditions (i.e. three playful things, using playfulness in a new way, and counting playfulness) or a placebo condition. Participants reported on global playfulness, facets of playfulness, well‐being, and depression at pretest, posttest, and at follow‐ups after 2, 4, and 12 weeks. Results: All interventions increased expressions in all facets of playfulness, had short‐term effects on well‐being, and ameliorated depression. Conclusion: Overall, findings suggest that playfulness can be stimulated by short self‐administered interventions.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a randomised placebo-controlled online trial, three 1-week self-administered playfulness exercises increased self-reported playfulness facets, with small-to-medium effects, and produced short-term well-being gains and reduced depressive symptoms. The authors conclude that playfulness can be stimulated by short self-administered interventions, though effects were small and moderation by baseline playfulness was mixed.

Key findings

  • Final sample: N = 533 completers (81.6% women; age 18–84, M = 43.76, SD = 12.67). All three playfulness conditions increased most OLIW facets up to 12 weeks versus placebo, with effect sizes .01 ≤ η² ≤ .06 (median = .02); the exception was no effect of counting playfulness on Whimsical playfulness.
  • “Using playfulness in a new way” showed increases for all playfulness facets and measurement time points; the strongest effect was on Lighthearted playfulness at the 2-week post measure (η² = .07).
  • Well-being increased and depressive symptoms decreased across intervention conditions; well-being effects lasted up to 12 weeks for “three playful things” and “counting playfulness,” and counting playfulness also showed depressive-symptom reductions up to 12 weeks.
  • Baseline global playfulness moderation effects were mixed and showed no consistent pattern (e.g., higher baseline was associated with greater Lighthearted increase in “three playful things,” but lower Other-directed/Intellectual and well-being effects in “counting playfulness,” and stronger depressive-symptom decreases in “using playfulness”).

Methods

  • Randomised placebo-controlled online intervention: 1,727 registered, 1,275 fulfilled inclusion criteria and were randomised; final N = 533 completers were assigned to one of three 1-week playfulness conditions (“three playful things,” “using playfulness in a new way,” “counting playfulness”) or a placebo condition (“early memories”), with pretest, posttest, and follow-ups after 2, 4, and 12 weeks.
  • Measures included the OLIW-S for four playfulness facets, the Authentic Happiness Inventory for well-being, the CES-D for depressive symptoms, and the SMAP for baseline global playfulness.
  • Analyses used ANCOVA comparing each intervention condition individually with placebo, controlling for pretest scores, plus moderation tests with baseline global playfulness.

Limitations

  • Stated: all ratings were self-report only; no additional Type I error controls were conducted despite many analyses; generalisability is limited to a well-educated, mostly women, German-speaking sample interested in online positive psychology-type interventions; there were considerable dropouts; there was no formal compliance test apart from self-reports; the study was not pre-registered and effects beyond 3 months were not assessed.
  • Stated: moderation findings were mixed and not fully understood; the authors note they cannot rule out that self-report increases reflect added attention to one’s playfulness rather than trait change.
  • Evident from the text: the placebo condition was an active early-memories writing task, so comparisons are against a placebo control rather than no treatment; completers differed from dropouts (older, lower depressive symptoms, slightly lower global and Other-directed playfulness, higher baseline well-being), which may further limit generalisability.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/aphw.12220

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

1 of 14 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    All intervention conditions showed overall increases in well-being.

    “Results suggested overall increases in well-being and decreases of depressive symptoms in all intervention conditions”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The counting playfulness condition showed reductions in depressive symptoms for up to 12 weeks.

    “while the latter condition also showed reductions in depressive symptoms for up to 12 weeks”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    There were no differences among the four conditions with regard to baseline demographics or dependent variables.

    “We found no differences among either the demographics or the dependent variables.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    For Lighthearted playfulness, only those who used their playfulness in a new way reported increased scores up to 12 weeks.

    “The exception was Lighthearted playfulness; for this facet, only those who used their playfulness in a new way reported increased scores up to 12 weeks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The interventions had short-term effects on well-being.

    “had short-term effects on well-being”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 20
  • May combine two claims. 13
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Participants who voluntarily continued with their activities beyond the instructed time period benefitted most from interventions.

    “Additionally, it has been shown that those participants that voluntarily continued with their activities beyond the instructed time period benefitted most from interventions (Gander et al., 2013;Proyer et al., 2015;Seligman et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gander et al., 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Proyer et al., 2015 source
    • cites Seligman et al., 2005 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Prolonged practice accounted for some of the effects, but the main conclusion that playfulness can be changed by deliberate interventions remained widely unaffected, even when excluding these participants.

    “While this prolonged practice accounted for some of the effects, the main conclusion that playfulness can be changed by deliberate interventions remained widely unaffected, even when excluding these participants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: People engaged in playful activities.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were several moderation effects of baseline levels of global playfulness, but no consistent pattern.

    “Table 4 shows that there were several moderation effects of baseline levels of global playfulness, but no consistent pattern”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The three playful things intervention demonstrated comparatively weaker and less systematic effects.

    “The three playful things intervention demonstrated comparatively weaker and less systematic effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most effects were small, but at least for the short term (2 weeks) larger effects were also observable.

    “It must be noted that most effects were small, but at least for the short term (2 weeks) larger effects were also observable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The three playful things intervention had small effects for up to 3 months for Other-directed playfulness and the largest effect for Whimsical playfulness after 2 weeks.

    “We found small effects for up to 3 months for Other-directed playfulness and the largest effect for Whimsical playfulness after 2 weeks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants who did not complete the study were on average younger and showed slightly increased symptoms of depressiveness and slightly lower levels in global and Other-directed facets of playfulness.

    “Our dropout analysis has shown that participants who did not complete our study were on average younger and showed slightly increased symptoms of depressiveness and slightly lower levels in global and Other-directed facets of playfulness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Attention shifts have been described as one of the working mechanisms of positive psychology interventions.

    “Attention shifts have been described as one of the working mechanisms of positive psychology interventions (Wellenzohn et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wellenzohn et al., 2016 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The OLIW-S has been tested with respect to repeated administration and has retest-stability for the 3-month interval of .74/.77/.67/.84.

    “The OLIW-S has been tested with respect to repeated administration in 199 participants for intervals of 1, 2, and 4 weeks, and 3 months: The retest-stability for the 3-month interval was .74/.77/.67/.84.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Proyer, Brauer, & Wolf, 2019

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    We did not have a formal test, apart from self-reports, of whether participants had completed the assignments as instructed.

    “Additionally, we did not have a formal test, apart from self-reports, of whether participants had completed the assignments as instructed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Internal consistencies across the five time points were high for the Authentic Happiness Inventory (a = .93/.95/.96/.96/.96).

    “Internal consistencies across the five time points were high; namely, a = .93/.95/ .96/.96/.96 for pretest, posttest, and follow-ups after 2, 4, and 12 weeks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The three playful things activity is easy to conduct, may be appealing to a broad range of people, and may be intuitively associated with a greater inclination to engage in playful thoughts and behaviors.

    “Given that this activity is easy to conduct, it may be appealing to a broad range of people and also intuitively associated with a greater inclination to engage in playful thoughts and behaviors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The early memories placebo control exercise is inert with respect to playfulness, well-being, and depression.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    There are interindividual differences in people's desire to change (aspects of) their personality.

    “Recently, Hudson and colleagues (2019; see also Hudson & Fraley, 2015) have shown that there are interindividual differences in people's desire to change (aspects of) their personality.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hudson et al., 2019 source
    • cites Hudson & Fraley, 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Some participants did prolong their active participation after the 7 days (by continuing to complete the homework after day 7).

    “Moreover, some participants did prolong their active participation after the 7 days (i.e. by continuing to complete the homework after day 7).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Engaging in trait-related behavioral goals (challenges) - instead of just accepting them - was a potent predictor of change.

    “Further, Hudson et al. used a 15-week longitudinal design in which participants could accept and engage in weekly”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hudson et al.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The internal consistency at pretest was high for the SMAP (a = .91).

    “The internal consistency at pretest was high (a = .91).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Seligman and colleagues (2005) showed that the use of self-administered online interventions is associated with an increase in well-being and amelioration of depression.

    “Seligman and colleagues (2005) showed that the use of self-administered online interventions is associated with an increase in well-being and amelioration of depression”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Seligman et al., 2005 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Participants were not aware of the existence of different conditions.

    “Participants were not aware of the existence of different conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study was approved by the local ethics committee and participants provided informed consent.

    “The study was approved by the local ethics committee and participants provided informed consent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    We did not conduct additional controls for Type I error.

    “Although our main focus was interpretations of standardised effect sizes instead of null-hypothesis significance tests, it must be acknowledged that we did not conduct additional controls for Type I error.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All ratings in this study are self-reports only.

    “Relatedly, it must be acknowledged that all ratings in this study are self-reports only.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    This finding has been replicated in a sample of German-speaking adults.

    “This finding has been replicated in a sample of German-speaking adults (Gander et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gander et al., 2013 source

      Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants were randomised to one of the four conditions using an automated algorithm.

    “were randomised to one of the four conditions (i.e. three playfulness interventions; one placebo condition; see Table 1) using an automated algorithm”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Thinking about using one's playfulness in a new way and experiencing positive emotions when doing so may both be useful strategies for increasing playfulness.

    “Hence, thinking about using one's playfulness in a new way and experiencing positive emotions when doing so may both be useful strategies for increasing playfulness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The early memories placebo control exercise is inert with respect to playfulness, well-being, and depression.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    All three interventions were effective in increasing most facets of playfulness for up to 3 months, although the effects tended to decrease over time.

    “Hence, all three interventions were effective in increasing most facets of playfulness for up to 3 months although the effects tended to decrease over time.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The early memories placebo control exercise is inert with respect to playfulness, well-being, and depression.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Those who failed to complete the assigned exercise were excluded from subsequent analyses.

    “Those who failed to do so were excluded from subsequent analyses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Internal consistencies across the five time points were high for the CES-D (a = .91/.90/.91/.91/.92).

    “Internal consistencies across the five time points were high (a = .91/.90/.91/.91/.92).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Trait activation theory proposes that engaging in trait-relevant situations plays a role in the expression of trait-related behaviors; for example, to engage in behaviors related to Other-directed playfulness, a social situation is required.

    “For example, the trait activation theory (Tett & Guterman, 2000) proposes that engaging in trait-relevant situations plays a role in the expression of trait-related behaviors; for example, to engage in behaviors related to Other-directed playfulness, a social situation is required (e.g. to tease someone in a playful manner).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tett & Guterman, 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    This study was not pre-registered.

    “This study was not pre-registered.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The finding that dropouts are younger is common in self-administered interventions and has been reported earlier.

    “This finding with regard to age is common in self-administered interventions and has been reported earlier (e.g.Gander et al., 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gander et al., 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

30 of 30
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no prior study that has tested trait-wise changes in playfulness in adults in a placebo-controlled design.

    “To the best of our knowledge, there is no study that has tested trait-wise changes in playfulness in adults in a placebo-controlled design.”
    “To the best of our knowledge this is the first placebo-controlled online study with the aim of increasing levels of playfulness and testing effects on self-reported levels of well-being and depression.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Participants will be able to actively engage in playful activities during the day.

    “we suggest that they will also be able to actively engage in playful activities during the day.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The early memories placebo control exercise is inert with respect to playfulness, well-being, and depression.

    “Early memories (placebo control) . . .write about their early memories from their childhood and should set aside 15 minutes before going to bed for this task (Seligman et al., 2005).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    People engaged in playful activities.

    “Hence, while we assume that people engaged in playful activities, their expression of them may have varied across individuals.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies using trait-based measures including the APTS have demonstrated consistent positive associations with global well-being indices and mental health outcomes.

    “Studies employing trait-based measures of adult playfulness, including the Adult Playfulness Trait Scale (APTS), have demonstrated consistent positive associations with global well-being indices and mental health outcomes (Proyer et al., 2021;Shen et al., 2017).”

    From Childhood and Adult Playfulness: Links with Well-Being and Interpersonal Relationships (2026) · cites this paper as Proyer et al., 2021

    The ‘Effects of Playfulness on Well-Being and Depression’ section (page unavailable) reports robust positive correlations between playfulness and happiness, positive affect, and life satisfaction. But the Instruments section (page unavailable) says this study used the SMAP, not the APTS, and its reported decreases in depressive symptoms followed interventions rather than demonstrating a consistent trait-based association with mental health outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Brief playfulness interventions can increase both trait playfulness and subjective well-being, suggesting that the relationship between playfulness and well-being may be bidirectional.

    “Proyer et al. (2021) demonstrated in a randomized controlled trial that even brief playfulness interventions could increase both trait playfulness and subjective well-being, suggesting that the relationship between playfulness and well-being may be bidirectional.”

    From Childhood and Adult Playfulness: Links with Well-Being and Interpersonal Relationships (2026) · cites this paper as Proyer et al. (2021)

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that the brief placebo-controlled intervention increased self-reported playfulness and produced small increases in well-being. The paper does not test whether increased well-being, in turn, increases trait playfulness, so the trial does not establish the suggested bidirectional relationship. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Adult playfulness is linked to positive psychological outcomes, including life satisfaction, positive affect, and reduced depressive symptoms.

    “This finding is consistent with a substantial body of research linking adult playfulness to positive psychological outcomes, including life satisfaction, positive affect, and reduced depressive symptoms (Proyer, 2012(Proyer, , 2014b;;Proyer et al., 2021;Brauer et al., 2024).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Abstract says every intervention increased every playfulness facet

    Minor

    The abstract says all interventions increased all facets, but the Results report no effect on Whimsical playfulness for the counting-playfulness intervention.

  • Completers and dropouts are each described as less playful

    Minor

    The preliminary analysis describes completers as lower in global and Other-directed playfulness than dropouts, whereas the Limitations section says dropouts had lower levels of both.

  • Two-week Lighthearted effect size is attributed to the wrong time point

    Minor

    The Results assign an effect size of .07 to the two-week measurement for using playfulness in a new way. Table 3 lists .06 for that condition at two weeks; .07 appears at the immediate posttest.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Chick G., 2001, What is play for? Sexual selection and the evolution of play, Play & Culture Studies, 3, 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Brauer, K., & Chick, G.
Affiliations
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Proyer, René T.
Venue
Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-25
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
129-151
ISSN
  • 1758-0846 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-0854
OpenAlex
W3080878010
Cited by
66
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (100014_132512, 100014_149772)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Humor Studies and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
playfulness, online intervention, well-being, depression, depressive symptoms, happiness, self-administered intervention, placebo-controlled intervention
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, Depression, Happiness, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-17.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-17.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review