The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cohesion in group therapy: A meta-analysis.
Abstract
Cohesion is the most popular of the relationship constructs in the group therapy literature. This article reviews common definitions of cohesion, the most frequently studied measures, and a measure that may clarify group relations using two latent factors (quality and structure) to explain common variance among frequently used group relationship instruments. We present the results of a meta-analysis examining the relation between group cohesion and treatment outcome in 55 studies. Results indicate that the weighted aggregate correlation between cohesion and treatment outcome was statistically significant, r = .26, z = 6.54 (p < .01), reflecting a moderate effect size (d = .56). Heterogeneity of effect sizes was significant (Q = 260.84, df = 54, p < .001) and high (I2 = 79.3%), supporting moderator analyses. Six moderator variables were found to significantly predict the magnitude of the cohesion-outcome association (type of outcome measure, leader interventions to increase cohesion, theoretical orientation, type of group, emphasis on group interaction, and dose or number of group sessions). Patient contributions, diversity considerations, and evidence-based therapeutic practices are highlighted. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Offering a therapeutic treatment program in a group, provided that the group dynamics are used adequately, has been found to strengthen the result of the treatment (Burlingame et al., 2018).”
From A Novel Psychological Group Intervention Targeting Appearance-Related Distress Among People With a Visible Disfigurement (Inside Out): A Case Study (2023) · cites this paper as Burlingame et al., 2018
In the citing paper
“Variance in therapists’ ability to form an effective therapeutic alliance70 and variance in group cohesion69,71 have been offered as common factors that might underlie these effects.”
From A common factors perspective on mindfulness-based interventions (2022) · cites this paper as [71]
Citations
Cites
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · Cited by 2,977
McNair, D. M. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,527
Inventory of interpersonal problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications.
Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureño, G., & Villaseñor, V. S. (1988) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.56.6.885 · Cited by 2,026
Encounter Groups: First Facts.
Touhey, J. C., Lieberman, M. A., Yalom, I. D., & Miles, M. B. (1974) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2063566 · Cited by 731
Feeney, J. A., Noller, P., & Hanrahan, M. U. (1994) · Cited by 687
Cohesion in group psychotherapy.
Burlingame, G. M., Fuhriman, A., & Johnson, J. E. (2001) · Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training · doi:10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.373 · Cited by 263
Self-citationJohnson, J. E., Burlingame, G. M., Olsen, J. A., Davies, D. R., & Gleave, R. L. (2005) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.310 · Cited by 263
Self-citationCohesion as a Basic Bond in Groups
Piper, W. E., Marrache, M., Lacroix, R., Richardsen, A. M., & Jones, B. (1983) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872678303600201 · Cited by 219
Group environment scale manual
Moos, R. H. (1986) · Consulting Psychologists Press eBooks · Cited by 212
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 96 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–290 of 290
Social Interaction of Rural Left-behind Children in Dafang County, China
Zhenyu, Z., & Wahab, N. B. A. (2023) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i8/18121
McGuire, A. B., Flanagan, M., Coffing, J., Traylor, M., Myers, L. J., Henry, N. H., Carter, J. L., Kukla, M., & Matthias, M. S. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3783148/v1
Boß, L., Hannibal, S., & Lehr, D. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.56093
McDonald, M., & Linden, M. (2024) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/jcp-2023-0022
Psychothérapie de groupe et groupes d’entraide en addictologie
Dufayet, G., & Moisan, D. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-2-294-77934-3.00063-9
D’Amico, E. J., Houck, J. M., Pedersen, E. R., Klein, D. J., Rodriguez, A., & Tucker, J. S. (2024) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.15272
Uren, S., & Lourens, H. (2024) · South African Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1177/00812463241234494 · Cited by 1
“It could be hypothesised that this group cohesion is one of the factors that kept interns in the programme, as group cohesion has been associated with lower dropout rates in group psychotherapy (Burlingame et al., 2018; Marziali et al., 1997).”
BackgroundUysal, B., Özkul, S., & Bayraktar, A. (2024) · International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research · doi:10.52380/ijcer.2024.11.2.540
Group Cohesion in Experiential Growth Groups: A Multilevel Growth Analysis
Zhu, P., Smith, T. J., Lee, I., & Schoonover, T. (2024) · International Journal of Group Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/00207284.2024.2365710
“The latent factor structure of the GQ has been replicated using a diverse range of samples, with scores from each subscale demonstrating evidence of good internal consistency reliability (Burlingame et al., 2018; Janis et al., 2018).”
Phases of Work and Associated Skills and Tasks in Group Work Practice
Knight, C. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197657928.003.0002
Group Work PracticeAn Overview
Knight, C. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197657928.003.0001
Südmeier, M., Gissendanner, S. S., Lorenz, K., & Muschalla, B. (2024) · PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie · doi:10.1055/a-2435-8015
“So wird bspw. die vielfach er-forschte Kohäsion [6, 7, 15] von den Therapeuten als positiv erlebt und somit für anstrebenswert gehalten.”
Dynamische Administration einer analytischen Gruppenselbsterfahrung – Das Jenaer Modell1
Wutzler, U., Venner, M., Friedel, L., Schadeberg, C., & Schlensog‐Schuster, F. (2024) · Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik · doi:10.13109/grup.2024.60.4.319
Okech, J. E. A., Rubel, D. J., & Kline, W. B. (2025) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394346691.ref
Bridges, A. J., Fradley, M. F., Mapes, A. R., Ledesma, R. J., Allen, E. L., Karlsson, M. E., & Zielinski, M. J. (2025) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci14020108
Tatnell, R., Constanti, A., Johansen, S. W. F., & Demmer, D. H. (2025) · Australian Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00050067.2025.2484001
“Group interventions can normal-ise experiences, introduce diverse perspectives, and decrease loneliness and isolation (Burlingame et al., 2018; Hambrook et al., 2022; Rosendahl et al., 2021).”
Shalabi, D., Plume, M., Berggren, H., Nguyen, H., Steingrímsson, S., Larson, T., Borg, J., & Wartenberg, C. (2025) · Journal of Affective Disorders Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2025.100930
Intervenção em Saúde a partir de Grupoterapia para Universitários: Uma Revisão Integrativa
de Miranda, L. E. R., de Sousa, R. C. T., & Evangelista, N. M. (2025) · ID on line REVISTA DE PSICOLOGIA · doi:10.14295/idonline.v19i75.4104
Group climate temporally precedes member improvement in emotional cultivation groups for youth
Wang, L.-F., Kivlighan, D. M., Wei, M., Koay, E. Y. Y., & Ho, C.-Y. (2025) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2025.2500506
“Additionally, focusing on only one aspect neglects the multidimensional nature of group climate (e.g., Burlingame et al., 2018).”
Grøtte, T., Laugen, N. J., Brattland, H., Skjervold, A. E., Iversen, V. R. C., & Holgersen, K. H. (2025) · European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation · doi:10.1016/j.ejtd.2025.100571
Outcome and Therapeutic Relationship Feedback in Group Therapy
Paxton, T., Griner, D., Beecher, M. E., & Burlingame, G. M. (2025) · CBT: science into practice · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-90428-8_11
Self-citationMasango, J., van der Merwe, T. R., Casteleijn, D., & Adams, F. (2025) · Mental Illness · doi:10.1155/mij/6341561
“Trust in group therapy develops through the creation and deepening of group cohesion [35, 38].”
Digitale Gruppentherapie: psychologische Ansätze und Konzepte zur Kommunikation mit Patientengruppen
Fischer, M. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-71034-0_8
Wutzler, U., Endler, P., Brith, U., Heine, J., Rezmer, D., Seebeck, V., Tögel, A., Wilda-Kiesel, A., & Villmann, T. (2025) · PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie · doi:10.1055/a-2682-2236
Nieuwhof, Z., Kooiman, M., Scholte, W. F., Reddingius, M., & Teijema, M. T. (2025) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph22111617
“Furthermore, several studies have shown that group cohesion (an element of group dynamics), the relationships within a group as a whole, or the group climate predicts treatment outcome [30–32].”
Mugford, L., Satchell, L. P., Kontosthenous, J., Copestake, S., & Shell, Y. (2025) · Psychology Crime and Law · doi:10.1080/1068316x.2025.2577667
Development of a Career Intervention for Women in a Transitional Housing Program
Cook, K. D., Hardin, E. E., Gibbons, M. M., King, B. C., & Sexton, K. K. (2025) · The Career Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/cdq.70006
Psychodynamische Gruppenpsychotherapie
Strauss, B. M. (2025) · PDP – Psychodynamische Psychotherapie · doi:10.21706/pdp-24-4-375
Hasselle, A. J., Renick, J., Moss, B. J., Gales, J. R., & Howell, K. H. (2025) · School Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s12310-025-09829-z
Garreta-Catala, I., Balagué, R. P., Abouzari, R., Carnaval, T., Solé, J. M. N., Videla, S., & Agulló-Ferré, J.-L. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23916790
Garreta-Catala, I., Balagué, R. P., Abouzari, R., Carnaval, T., Solé, J. M. N., Videla, S., & Agulló-Ferré, J.-L. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23916775
Garreta-Catala, I., Balagué, R. P., Abouzari, R., Carnaval, T., Solé, J. M. N., Videla, S., & Agulló-Ferré, J.-L. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23916799
Garreta-Catala, I., Balagué, R. P., Abouzari, R., Carnaval, T., Solé, J. M. N., Videla, S., & Agulló-Ferré, J.-L. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23916772
Garreta-Catala, I., Balagué, R. P., Abouzari, R., Carnaval, T., Solé, J. M. N., Videla, S., & Agulló-Ferré, J.-L. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23916793
Garreta-Catala, I., Balagué, R. P., Abouzari, R., Carnaval, T., Solé, J. M. N., Videla, S., & Agulló-Ferré, J.-L. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23916784
Garreta-Catala, I., Balagué, R. P., Abouzari, R., Carnaval, T., Solé, J. M. N., Videla, S., & Agulló-Ferré, J.-L. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23916802
Garreta-Catala, I., Balagué, R. P., Abouzari, R., Carnaval, T., Solé, J. M. N., Videla, S., & Agulló-Ferré, J.-L. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23916796
Graf, D., Sigrist, C., Boege, I., Cavelti, M., Koenig, J., & Kaess, M. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26027531
Baker, J. C., Grover, S. G., Gunn, L. H., Charles, C., Rikli, H., Franks, M. J., Khazem, L. R., Williams, S., Ammendola, E., Washington, C., et al. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24751395
Garreta-Catala, I., Balagué, R. P., Abouzari, R., Carnaval, T., Solé, J. M. N., Videla, S., & Agulló-Ferré, J.-L. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23916787
Garreta-Catala, I., Balagué, R. P., Abouzari, R., Carnaval, T., Solé, J. M. N., Videla, S., & Agulló-Ferré, J.-L. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.23916781
Rethinking Quality Assessment Tools for Social Work Evidence Synthesis Research
Rafieifar, M., & Naseh, M. (2025) · Social Work Research · doi:10.1093/swr/svaf027
Harmsen, C. R. W., Cordeiro, K., Rependa, S. L., Baranowsky, A., & Muller, R. T. (2026) · International Journal of Group Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/00207284.2025.2602009
“Group climate also supports the development of cohesion and a safe, collaborative group space (Burlingame et al., 2018; McClendon & Burlingame, 2010).”
Bailey, S., Ruggles, T., Zwickl, S., Barrett, E. L., & Cheung, A. S. (2026) · International Journal of Transgender Health · doi:10.1080/26895269.2025.2606748
Mailey, E. L., Besenyi, G. M., Bhatia, K., Leer, M. V., & Durtschi, J. A. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.02.09.26343939
Warner, G., Löfving, S. G., & Geijer‐Simpson, E. (2026) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2026.100918
“The extant literature shows that group cohesion is an important factor in group therapy (Burlingame et al., 2018).”
Wilfer, T., Spitzer, C., & Körber, A. (2026) · Nordic Journal of Music Therapy · doi:10.1080/08098131.2026.2613875
“In addition, specific factors of group therapy (Yalom & Leszcz, 2021), such as group cohesion (Burlingame et al., 2018), but also interpersonal learning or the experience of the universality of suffering (Strauß, 2022), can be beneficial.”
Dinis, M., Gonçalves, T., Barbosa, B., & Freire, T. (2026) · International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology · doi:10.1007/s41042-026-00273-1
“…out, reinforc - ing the idea that in a group dynamic, collective engagement is essential to create a more collaborative, reciprocal environment and a cohesive group relationship, thus stimulating a richer and more fruitful exchange of experiences for all participants (Burlingame et al., 2018 ).”
Irniger, C., Vetter, J., Weidt, S., Seifritz, E., Holtforth, M. G., & Krähenmann, R. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1756871
Rivard, M., Desjardins, L., Mestari, Z., Lefebvre, C., Patel, S., Tremblay, J., Bergeron, É., Bellenger, J., & Roch, L. (2026) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-026-14402-8
Christensen, A. B., Michelsen, E., Nielsen, J., Jørgensen, M. S., Bo, S., Beck, E., & Simonsen, E. H. (2026) · Counselling and Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/capr.70098
Efficacité de l'entretien motivationnel de groupe dans le trouble de l'usage de l'alcool
Devulder, L. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/98e3fe90zc29ez4d26z89bczc9e36b7fe3da
Garant, E., & Gauthier, A. (2026) · Journal of Child Sexual Abuse · doi:10.1080/10538712.2026.2658664
“Multiple studies have shown that the development of a therapeutic alliance was predictive of the psychotherapeutic outcomes (Burlingame et al., 2018; Marshall et al., 2011; Martin et al., 2000) and even more effective than the mere application of therapeutic techniques and procedures (Norcross &…”
Influential5.8 Anträge, Dokumentation und Evaluation von Gruppenpsychotherapien
Strauss, B. M. (2026) · Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht eBooks · doi:10.13109/9783666400575.351
Strauss, B. M. (2026) · Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht eBooks · doi:10.13109/9783666400575.94
Koffert, T., Luutonen, S. H., & Hietala, J. A. (2026) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-026-08131-9
“In their meta-analysis, Burlingame et al. [52] showed that group cohesion is in general predictive of psychotherapy outcome.”
Group and Team Coaching Psychology
Nacif, A. P. (2026) · doi:10.1002/9781394292806.ch21
Sondhu, M. K., Dunne, A. L., Maharaj, N., Loft, N., & Daffern, M. (2026) · Psychiatry Psychology and Law · doi:10.1080/13218719.2026.2651177
Gu, L., Xu, S., Zhang, Y., Huang, Y., & Chen, J. (2026) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-026-01644-4 · Cited by 1
“The questionnaire was developed by the research team drawing on established frameworks for group therapy process evaluation [45] and was designed to capture domains relevant to the present intervention.”
Unseld, F., & Miess, M. (2026) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104400
Baldwin, D., Tasca, G. A., Garceau, C., Braham, J., & Eubanks, C. F. (2026) · International Journal of Group Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/00207284.2026.2664422
“Although research provides evidence for the clinical utility of this approach (e.g., Burlingame et al., 2018), the GQ does not measure ruptures that occurred and were repaired within a given session and thus may not capture some of the nuances of these processes.”
McPhail, I. V., Igoumenou, A., Gerritsen, C. J., Heasman, A., Stephens, S., Dadgardoust, L., Shatokhina, K., Chouinard-Thivierge, S., Mitrevski, D., Kelly, E., et al. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.103515
Tezanos, K. M., Macrynikola, N., Villareal, L., Doerr, J., Suazo, N., Whiteley, L., & Yen, S. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0350008
“Indeed, research shows that group characteristics, such as cohesion, can significantly impact treatment outcomes for groups targeting depression and other psychiatric conditions [37].”
Choi, E., Roth, M. E., Hacker, E. D., Li, Y., & Lü, Q. (2026) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/93460 · Cited by 1
“Second, understanding AYA preferences for group composition is itself a relevant question for intervention optimization, as group cohesion and perceived relevance are known to influence engagement in group-based psychosocial interventions [48].”
Understanding meta-analysis: A powerful tool for clinical psychology
Tommasi, M. (2026) · Group Analysis · doi:10.1177/05333164261454129
“…variables (e.g., cohesion) into outcome models, and (d) surfacing research gaps that orient GASi’s training and agenda-setting toward designs capable of capturing the social unconscious and large-group phenomena that characterize group analytic work (Burlingame et al., 2018; Kösters et al, 2006).”
Urmanche, A. A., & Eubanks, C. F. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-29009-1.00056-1
Group Process Observation and the Process Observer Role: Reflections from Experienced Group Workers
Glynn, W., McCarthy, C. J., Choudhuri, D. D., Syed, R. M., & Rienzo, F. D. (2026) · The Journal for Specialists in Group Work · doi:10.1080/01933922.2026.2681439
“Group cohesion, a central relational process in group therapy, is linked to stronger alliance, engagement, and positive treatment outcomes (Burlingame et al., 2011, 2018) and emerges through interactional dynamics such as inclusion, participation, conflict, and affect expression (Brown, 2009).”
The use of humor in depression: An integration of benefits and risks
Braniecka, A. (2026) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102781
Ristianti, D. H., Murtadho, A., & Maarif, S. (2026) · Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi · doi:10.17066/tpdrd.1761855
Ladwig, G., Schönhals, K., Quittkat, H. L., Dietel, F. A., & Vocks, S. (2026) · Verhaltenstherapie · doi:10.1159/000551365
Ruptures in Working Alliance and Group Cohesion
Kleinberg, J. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-21404-1_7
Art making on the nervous system: A mixed methods study
Andrus, M., Harmon-Walker, G., & Feddersen, K. (2026) · The Arts in Psychotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.aip.2026.102497
Preliminary effects of a compassion-focused therapy for adolescents with epilepsy
Batchelor, R., Ferne, E., & Violette, M. (2026) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2026.111179
Mukasa, M. N., Donahue, M. L., Levin, M. E., Rodríguez, M. M. D., Kasujja, R., Damulira, C., & Vance, J. (2026) · Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2026.101017
Zemore, S. E., Mericle, A. A., Lui, C. K., Bergman, B. G., & Timko, C. (2026) · Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/acer.70371
Moments of Change in Group Psychotherapy: Exploring Therapeutic Factors and Relational Processes
Chelios, K., & Vlachos, I. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16081418
“While cohesion is often viewed as central (Marmarosh et al., 2005; Burlingame et al., 2018), research shows that the salience of different factors varies depending on group composition and context (Brand ã o et al., 2019; Wills et al., 2018).”
Leiderman, L. M. (2026) · International Journal of Group Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/00207284.2026.2690227
“Research consistently shows that the therapeutic alliance with group leaders is strongly correlated with positive treatment outcomes (Alldredge, 2022; Burlingame et al., 2018).”
Piccolo, A., Cara, M. D., Messina, S., Domenico, C. D., Fulgenzi, A., Borzelli, D., Impallomeni, C., Tripodi, E., Quartarone, A., & Cucinotta, F. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14162566
“At an interpersonal level, the group context may simultaneously provide opportunities for interpersonal feedback [54], shared narratives [55], and reciprocal recognition [56,57].”
Merrill, B. M. (2026) · Journal of Creativity in Mental Health · doi:10.1080/15401383.2026.2724384
“Psychotherapy has long used storytelling (Armeniox, 2015), role-playing (Cruz et al., 2018), and group process (Burlingame et al., 2018), and TTRPGs offered a ready-made rule-governed format for collaborative storytelling that could be adapted to clinical aims (Baker et al., 2022).”
Gehrmann, J., Stephan, J., Stullich, A., & Richter, M. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.110034
Marmarosh, C. L., Ge, S., Kivlighan, D. M., Lyons, R., Watts, E., & Hewitt, P. L. (2026) · International Journal of Group Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/00207284.2026.2684484
Chu, Y. J., & Kivlighan, D. M. (2026) · International Journal of Group Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/00207284.2026.2726749
Prentice, C. M., Bondi, S., Juul-Hansen, S., Zahl, E., Vatne, T. M., & Fjermestad, K. W. (2026) · The Journal for Specialists in Group Work · doi:10.1080/01933922.2026.2716636
“This is an important caveat, as higher levels of group member participation may be linked to group cohesion, which in turn is known to predict better outcomes for members of therapeutic or support groups (Burlingame et al., 2018).”
Chen, Y., Xiao, X., Yang, Q., & Lu, Y. (2026) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/10464964261485581
Liu, H., Choi, J., & So, H. (2026) · The Arts in Psychotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.aip.2026.102552
Weintz, L. P. H., Strauss, B. M., & Dinger, U. (2026) · Gruppenpsychotherapie und Gruppendynamik · doi:10.13109/grup.2026.62.3.199
Phillips, N. L., Miller, J. D., Carter, N. T., Maples‐Keller, J. L., Rauch, S. A. M., Rothbaum, B. O., & Hyatt, C. S. (2026) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026261471418
Ulvestad, D. A., Kvarstein, E. H., Ekberg, A., Sætre, P. L., Pedersen, G., & Wilberg, T. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1919516
Pesqueira, A. M. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14203405
Blest, K., & Griffin, S. (2026) · The Journal for Specialists in Group Work · doi:10.1080/01933922.2026.2743476
“Emphasizing positive and caring interaction among participants would promote cohesion, and the grappling component may further encourage cohesion by facilitating increased interaction among members while creating close-knit relationships among participants (Burlingame et al., 2018).”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Burlingame, G. M., McClendon, D. T., & Yang, C.
- Affiliations
- Brigham Young University (US)
- Venue
- Psychotherapy
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 384-398
- ISSN
- 0033-3204 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1536
- OpenAlex
- W2895900470
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12
- FWCI
- 18.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- group cohesion, group therapy, treatment outcomes, group relations, group interaction, theoretical orientation, group types, patient diversity, evidence-based treatment
- MeSH terms
- Mental Disorders, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Psychotherapy, Group, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review