Cited by 2,026Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Testing and AssessmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Inventory of interpersonal problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications.

Horowitz, Leonard M., Rosenberg, Saul E., Baer, Barbara A., Ureño, Gilbert, Villaseñor, Valerie S.·1988·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Un nouvel instrument mesurant la detresse provenant des situations interpersonnelles, le «inventory of Interpersonal Problems» (IIP), est decrit dans ses proprietes psychometriques et dans ses applications cliniques, en particulier dans l'evaluation des effets de la psychotherapie

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.56.6.885

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A robot able to express emotions and use appropriate gaze behaviors inspires cooperative and adaptive behaviors in its human teammates, resulting in more successful and efficient collaboration compared to robots without emotional expression or with random gaze behaviors.

    “For instance, a robot able to express emotions and use appropriate gaze behaviors was found to inspire cooperative and adaptive behaviors in its human teammates, which resulted in more successful and efficient collaboration compared to robots without emotional expression or with random gaze behaviors [69].”

    From A Taxonomy of Social Errors in Human-Robot Interaction (2021) · cites this paper as [69]

  • The IIP has excellent psychometric properties, with 0.75 ≤ α ≤ 0.94, and its criterion validity has been demonstrated via correlations to the SCL-90-R with 0.07 ≤ r ≤ 0.75.

    “It has excellent psychometric properties, with 0.75 ≤ α ≤ 0.94. The criterion validity of the measure has been demonstrated via correlations to the SCL-90-R with 0.07 ≤ r ≤ 0.75.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureño, G., & Villaseñor, V. S.
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
1988
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
885-892
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2155175889
Cited by
2,026
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 83 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 93 · 2012: 79
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh040417-03, 2s07rr005521-29)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH40417)
  • National Center for Research Resources (2 S07 RR05521-24)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, interpersonal distress, psychometric properties, clinical application, psychotherapy outcome assessment, interpersonal problems
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review