Cited by 16Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling Practices and SupervisionPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Patients’ experiences of being “ghosted” by their psychotherapists

Farber, Barry A., Hubbard, Emily, Ort, Daisy·2022·Psychotherapy

Abstract

age = 34) who reported being ghosted by their therapist completed a web-based therapist ghosting survey (TGS) that assessed their perceptions of multiple aspects of this event. Results indicated that these patients, on average, unsuccessfully attempted to contact their therapist four times following being ghosted but that the great majority never again communicated with this therapist; they attributed being ghosted to several possibilities, including their therapist's finding them too difficult, their therapist's own problems, and/or a major event in their therapist's personal life. They experienced shock, frustration, anxiety, resentment, and sadness as a result of this action, emotions that tended to dissipate over time. Given its emotional toll on patients and the ethical violation inherent in the act of ghosting, further research on the prevalence, consequences, and therapists' motives for this behavior seems imperative. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/pst0000454

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most ghostees (83.9%) did not reach out to their therapists for an explanation after being ghosted by them.

    “With respect to therapist ghosting, some ghostees tried to reach out to their therapists for an explanation, but most (83.9%) did not, concluding either that they were somehow responsible (21.3%) or that something occurred in the therapist's personal life.”

    From Ghosting: Abandonment in the Digital Era (2023) · cites this paper as [13]

  • Among ghostees who did not reach out to their therapists, 21.3% concluded they were somehow responsible.

    “With respect to therapist ghosting, some ghostees tried to reach out to their therapists for an explanation, but most (83.9%) did not, concluding either that they were somehow responsible (21.3%) or that something occurred in the therapist's personal life.”

    From Ghosting: Abandonment in the Digital Era (2023) · cites this paper as [13]

  • Approximately 16% of patients who were ghosted by their therapists managed to recontact their therapist.

    “Approximately 16% of the patients in this study managed to recontact their therapist [13].”

    From Ghosting: Abandonment in the Digital Era (2023) · cites this paper as [13]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farber, B. A., Hubbard, E., & Ort, D.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Psychotherapy
Published
2022-12
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
545-553
ISSN
  • 0033-3204 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1536
OpenAlex
W4289845547
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
patient experience, patient-therapist communication, emotional impact, ethical violations
MeSH terms
Psychotherapists, Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review