Cited by 45Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsPosthumanist Ethics and Activism

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Championing “reflexivities”.

Open access
Finlay, Linda·2017·Qualitative Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/qup0000075

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Finlay, L.
Corresponding author
Finlay, Linda
Venue
Qualitative Psychology
Published
2017-08
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
120-125
ISSN
  • 2326-3598 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-3601
OpenAlex
W4254767032
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Qualitative Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Keywords
reflexivity, researcher reflexivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review