Cited by 10Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchPsychological Testing and AssessmentCognitive Functions and Memory

Feasibility of National Institutes of Health toolbox cognition battery in pediatric brain injury rehabilitation settings

Watson, William, Pedowitz, Alison, Nowak, Sophie, Neumayer, Christine, Kaplan, Elana, Shah, Sudhin·2020·Rehabilitation Psychology

Abstract

Objective Cognitive impairments are a devastating consequence of acquired brain injury (ABI) in children. Current pediatric tools for assessing cognitive impairments are generally time intensive and applicable only to a restricted age span. The National Institutes of Health Toolbox-Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) is a standardized, tablet-based cognitive assessment that has been normed across the life span in the general population and validated in adults with brain injuries. However, its clinical utility and validity has not yet been demonstrated in pediatric patients with brain injuries. The current study examines the feasibility of NIHTB-CB administration in both a pediatric inpatient and day treatment rehabilitation setting. Design The NIHTB-CB was attempted in 40 children with ABI aged 4-18 years within 1 year of injury in pediatric rehabilitation settings. Results Of the 40 participants tested, 38 (95%) were able to complete the full battery and 28 were able to complete it in 1 session. The average time to complete the NIHTB-CB for our sample was 40.2 min. Barriers to completion included both external (scheduling conflicts) and internal (fatigue, attention, and behavioral) limitations. Cohort results are consistent with expected impairments following ABI. Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility of using the NIHTB-CB in postacute pediatric inpatient rehabilitation and day-treatment clinical settings following ABI. The NIHTB-CB has the potential to provide a quic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/rep0000309

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watson, W., Pedowitz, A., Nowak, S., Neumayer, C., Kaplan, E., & Shah, S.
Affiliations
Blythedale Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
Rehabilitation Psychology
Published
2020-02
Volume
65
Issue
1
Pages
22-30
ISSN
  • 0090-5550 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1544
OpenAlex
W2999102134
Cited by
10
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Rehabilitation Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery, pediatric acquired brain injury, cognitive impairment assessment, tablet-based cognitive assessment, feasibility, pediatric rehabilitation, day treatment, inpatient rehabilitation, assessment time, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain Injuries, Child, Child, Preschool, Cognition Disorders, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, United States, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review