Cited by 180Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesAutomotive and Human Injury Biomechanics

Long-term outcome from childhood traumatic brain injury: Intellectual ability, personality, and quality of life.

Anderson, Vicki, Brown, Sandra, Newitt, Heidi, Hoile, Hannah·2011·Neuropsychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Only a handful of studies have attempted to explore very long-term outcomes from childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI). These studies have generally failed to fully consider the impact of injury severity or employ measures sensitive to the survivor's day-to-day function. This study examined outcomes in adulthood, with a focus on functional abilities including education, employment, and quality of life (QOL), and employed predictors including injury severity, age at injury, socioeconomic factors, intelligence, and personality. METHOD: The study was retrospective and cross-sectional and included 50 adult survivors of child TBI (31 males), aged 19-30 years at evaluation (M = 24.2, SD = 3.6), with injury on average 13.3 years prior to evaluation. Participants were divided according to injury severity-mild (n = 20), moderate (n = 12), and severe (n = 18)-completed an intellectual evaluation and questionnaires regarding educational and employment status, personality, and quality of life. RESULTS: Intellectual and personality measures indicated good outcomes, with mean scores for all groups in the average range and few severity-based findings. In contrast, those with more severe TBI were more likely to have educational and employment problems. QOL was significantly reduced in the context of severe insult, with lower IQ and personality factors most predictive of outcome in this domain. Mild and moderate TBI were generally more benign. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that, while TBI is a lifelong problem, its impact is most dramatic in the domain of QOL, where a complex interaction occurs between injury factors, cognition, and personality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0021217

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, V., Brown, S., Newitt, H., & Hoile, H.
Affiliations
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Neuropsychology
Published
2011
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
176-184
ISSN
  • 0894-4105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1559
OpenAlex
W2021181793
Cited by
180
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Keywords
pediatric traumatic brain injury, long-term outcomes, quality of life, injury severity, intellectual ability, personality, educational attainment, employment status, socioeconomic factors, age at injury, adult survivors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain Injuries, Employment, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Personality, Personality Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Age of Onset, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review