Cited by 14COVID-19 and Mental HealthMental Health Treatment and AccessLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The relationship between stigma and mental health in a population of individuals with COVID-19.

Abstract

Purpose Illness stigma has been observed across previous outbreaks including Ebola, SARS, HIV/AIDS, and now COVID-19. Although both the stigma of having COVID-19 as well as mental health impacts of COVID-19 have been studied, limited research exists regarding the relationship of stigma and mental health in this population. Thus, the primary purpose of the present study was to examine the relationship between stigma and mental health in adults with COVID-19. Method Adult respondents with a diagnosis of COVID-19 ( N = 632) completed an online questionnaire distributed between April 17, 2020, and April 18, 2021. The study measures included the Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (PHQ-8), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7), and the 8-Item Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness (SSCI-8) tailored to measure perceived stigmatization from a COVID-19 diagnosis. Results Participants (mean age = 51) were mostly female (71%), White (73%), married (70%), obese (56%), and had a chronic health condition (56%). Female sex, education status, working from home or not working owing to COVID-19, previous mental health diagnosis, history of chronic illness, and being a current/former smoker were associated with higher stigma scores, whereas older age and Black race were associated with lower stigma scores. Conclusions Greater stigma and psychological distress was observed in females with a previously diagnosed psychiatric illness and/or chronic health condition. Our findings suggest a dispropor…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/rep0000436

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Warren, A. M., Khetan, R., Bennett, M., Pogue, J., Waddimba, A. C., Powers, M. B., & Sanchez, K.
Affiliations
Baylor Scott & White Research Institute (US)
Venue
Rehabilitation Psychology
Published
2022-05
Volume
67
Issue
2
Pages
226-230
ISSN
  • 0090-5550 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1544
OpenAlex
W4226411999
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Rehabilitation Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Baylor Scott & White-Dallas Foundation
  • Communities Foundation of North Texas
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, disease stigma, mental health, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, chronic disease, psychiatric comorbidity, sex differences, racial disparities, post-traumatic stress disorder, COVID-19 survivors
MeSH terms
COVID-19, COVID-19 Testing, Adult, Mental Disorders, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review