Cited by 102Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major DepressionMental Health Research Topics

Life stress and major depression: The mysteries of recurrences.

Monroe, Scott M., Anderson, Samantha F., Harkness, Kate L.·2019·Psychological Review

Abstract

Approximately half of the people who suffer a major depressive episode for the first time experience recurrences, while the other half do not. Among the initially depressed, however, who will have recurrences remains a mystery, and cannot be forecasted with any statistical or clinical confidence. It is well documented, though, that highly stressful life events commonly precede first episodes of major depression, and that these experiences become progressively less common prior to recurrences. Determining the basis for this consistent empirical observation holds promise for discovering among the initially depressed who will become recurrent, helping to solve the current-day conundrum of recurrences. The present article has 2 overarching objectives. First, we evaluate stress sensitization, the prevailing theory for explaining the decreasing association of major life events with successive recurrences. Conceptual gaps, discrepancies, and misunderstandings are found for understanding the decreasing association, as well as for understanding recurrences. Research practices and logical errors also are exposed that compromise the integrity of the existing empirical record. Second, alternative theoretical accounts are proposed to explain the decreasing association of major life stress with recurrences. Two "dual pathway models" provide viable alternative explanations, fill in existing theoretical gaps, and supply additional advantages for understanding life stress, depression, and recurrences. Recommendations are made for evaluating the 3 respective models. In closing, limitations and remaining questions are discussed for discovering who, early in the lifetime course of major depression, is likely to have a lifetime of repeated recurrences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/rev0000157

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monroe, S. M., Anderson, S. F., & Harkness, K. L.
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
2019-11
Volume
126
Issue
6
Pages
791-816
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2967472886
Cited by
102
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 10 · 2013: 1
FWCI
11.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John Simon Guggenheim Foundation
  • William K. Warren Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
major depressive disorder, depression recurrence, life events, stress sensitization, dual-pathway model, first-episode depression
MeSH terms
Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Models, Psychological, Psychological Theory, Stress, Psychological, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review