Cited by 37Mental Health Treatment and AccessGlobal Health Workforce IssuesPsychiatric care and mental health services

A phenomenological study of clinicians’ perspectives on barriers to rural mental health care

Jensen, Emily Jordan, Wieling, Elizabeth, Mendenhall, Tai·2020·Journal of Rural Mental Health

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/rmh0000125

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jensen, E. J., Wieling, E., & Mendenhall, T.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Journal of Rural Mental Health
Published
2020-01
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
51-61
ISSN
  • 1935-942X (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-8969
OpenAlex
W2999978831
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Rural Mental Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
rural mental health services, barriers to care, clinicians' perspectives, rural health care, access to mental health care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review