Cited by 27Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentCrime Patterns and InterventionsPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Juvenile justice anger management (JJAM) treatment for girls: results of a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Goldstein, Naomi E. S., Giallella, Christy L., Haney-Caron, Emily, Peterson, Lindsey, Serico, Jennifer, Kemp, Kathleen, Romaine, Christina Riggs, Zelechoski, Amanda D. +13 more·2018·Psychological Services

Abstract

This study examined the efficacy of the Juvenile Justice Anger Management (JJAM) Treatment for Girls, an anger management and aggression reduction treatment designed to meet the unique needs of adolescent girls in residential juvenile justice facilities. This randomized controlled trial of JJAM compared changes in levels of anger and aggression among girls who participated in the JJAM treatment with those of girls who participated in treatment as usual (TAU) at the facilities. This study also investigated the theoretical model underlying the JJAM treatment, which proposed that reductions in hostile attribution biases, development of emotion regulation skills, and improvement in social problem solving would serve as mechanisms of action in JJAM. Participants were 70 female youth who ranged in age from 14 to 20 years (M = 17.45, SD = 1.24) and were placed at 1 of 3 participating juvenile justice facilities; 57 youth completed the study and were included in analyses. Results revealed greater reductions in anger, reactive physical aggression, and reactive relational aggression among girls in the JJAM treatment condition when compared to girls in the TAU control condition. The proposed theoretical model was partially supported via significant mediation findings; changes in hostile attribution bias were identified as a significant mechanism of action in the JJAM treatment. Results suggest that JJAM is a promising treatment to effectively reduce anger and reactive aggression among adolescent girls in juvenile justice placements. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ser0000184

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings are consistent with a previous ERIC study in acutely vulnerable young people in residential drug rehabilitation and with emotion regulation intervention studies in other cohorts of vulnerable young people.

    “These findings are consistent with a previous study of the ERIC intervention with acutely vulnerable young people in residential drug rehabilitation (Sloan et al., 2018) and emotion regulation intervention studies in other cohorts of vulnerable young people including those with BPD and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI; Bjureberg et al., 2017) and aggressive behaviors (Goldstein et al., 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldstein, N. E. S., Giallella, C. L., Haney-Caron, E., Peterson, L., Serico, J., Kemp, K., Romaine, C. R., Zelechoski, A. D., Holliday, S. B., Kalbeitzer, R., Kelley, S. M., Hinz, H., Sallee, M., Pennacchia, D., Prelic, A., Burkard, C., Grisso, T., Heilbrun, K., Núñez, A., Leff, S., & Lochman, J.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
Venue
Psychological Services
Published
2018-11
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
386-397
ISSN
  • 1541-1559 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-148X
OpenAlex
W2899093703
Cited by
27
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Services (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ValpoScholar (Valparaiso University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23 MH 070400)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
anger management, aggression reduction, adolescent girls, hostile attribution bias, emotion regulation, social problem solving, reactive aggression, relational aggression, treatment efficacy, mechanisms of change
MeSH terms
Anger Management Therapy, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Aggression, Anger, Female, Humans, Juvenile Delinquency, Models, Psychological, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review