Cited by 52Occupational Health and PerformanceMental Health Treatment and AccessPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Behavioral health programs in fire service: surveying access and preferences

Open access
Gulliver, Suzy B., Pennington, Michelle L., Torres, Victoria A., Steffen, Laurie E., Mardikar, Amruta, Leto, Frank, Ostiguy, William, Zimering, Rose T. +1 more·2019·Psychological Services

Abstract

Due to the stressful nature of the job, firefighters are likely to be at increased risk for behavioral health problems. This study examined the access, attitudes, and preferences of a large sample of professional firefighters (N = 2,156) toward behavioral health services using an online survey. Overall, 81% of participants reported that they had access to behavioral health services through their fire service department, although smaller departments were less likely to offer such services. Despite available programs within fire service, firefighters most commonly reported that they would seek outside help from their spouse/family (67%) or private professional services (60%). Firefighters with fewer years in service were more likely to go to a spouse/family member, coworker, or officer for help, whereas those with more years were more likely to seek private professional services. Few firefighters directly stated that stigma would prevent them from using behavioral health services, yet a large percentage of firefighters (68%) reported that they would not recommend these services to colleagues, and stigma-related barriers were still among the most significant reported. "Clinicians who understand firefighter work culture" was rated as one of the most important components to a successful behavioral health program; a lack thereof rated as one of the most significant barriers. Offered together, these findings suggest that greater exploration of stigma in fire service is warranted, and attention toward training culturally competent clinicians to work with firefighters is needed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ser0000222

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gulliver, S. B., Pennington, M. L., Torres, V. A., Steffen, L. E., Mardikar, A., Leto, F., Ostiguy, W., Zimering, R. T., & Kimbrel, N. A.
Affiliations
  • Baylor Scott & White Health (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • New York City Fire Department (US)
  • VA Boston Healthcare System (US)
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
Venue
Psychological Services
Published
2019-05
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
340-345
ISSN
  • 1541-1559 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-148X
OpenAlex
W2790164919
Cited by
52
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
9.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Services (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (EMW2007FP02550)
  • Department of Veterans Affairs (IK2 CX000525)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
firefighters, behavioral health services, access to mental health care, help-seeking preferences, stigma, occupational stress, organizational culture, length of service
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Preference, Social Stigma, Firefighters, Culturally Competent Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review