Cited by 6Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Health and TraumaPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Residential PTSD treatment outcomes during cognitive processing therapy for veterans with and without recent histories of cannabis use

Hale, Andrew C., Bremer-Landau, Jodi, Wright, Theodore P., McDowell, Joan E., Rodriguez, Jessica L.·2021·Psychological Services

Abstract

Prior evidence has suggested that cannabis use is associated with greater posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom severity and worse outcomes following trauma-focused treatment. However, lack of high-quality randomized studies necessitates the use of clinical data to clarify the relationship between cannabis use and PTSD treatment to help inform clinical practice. A total of 114 veterans completed cognitive processing therapy in a residential PTSD treatment program. Differences in treatment response between cannabis users and nonusers were evaluated for measures of PTSD, depression, and posttraumatic growth using analysis of covariance to control for pretreatment scores and other drug use. At baseline, cannabis users reported higher levels of PTSD symptom severity relative to nonusers but reported similar levels of depression and posttraumatic growth. Significant differences between groups in the amount of change were not observed on any of the measures from before to after treatment; however, the total sample reported significant improvements in all measures of interest. These results suggest that PTSD treatment outcomes for cannabis users may be similar to nonusers when use is stopped during treatment. Additional data are needed regarding whether outcomes remain similar at follow-up, whether cannabis users maintain abstinence after treatment, and the impact of resumed cannabis use on PTSD symptoms. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/ser0000424

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hale, A. C., Bremer-Landau, J., Wright, T. P., McDowell, J. E., & Rodriguez, J. L.
Affiliations
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US)
  • Battle Creek VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
Psychological Services
Published
2021-11
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
497-503
ISSN
  • 1541-1559 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-148X
OpenAlex
W3010068503
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, cannabis use, cognitive processing therapy, veterans, treatment response, depression, posttraumatic growth, cannabis abstinence, trauma-focused psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Cannabis, Humans, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review