What’s the point? Faculty perceptions of research methods courses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most psychology faculty (79%) identify the development of scientific thinking as the most important reason for requiring a research methods class in the curriculum.
“Most psychology faculty (79%) identify the development of scientific thinking as the most important reason for requiring a research methods class in the curriculum (Ciarocco et al., 2017).”
From Lessons from the field: Isn't it just common sense? Naïve realism as a barrier to learning (2024) · cites this paper as Ciarocco et al., 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lessons from the field: Isn't it just common sense? Naïve realism as a barrier to learning
Dyer, K. D. (2024) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12967 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ciarocco, N. J., Strohmetz, D. B., & Lewandowski, G. W.
- Venue
- Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 116-131
- ISSN
- 2332-2101 (ISSN-L)
- 2332-211X
- OpenAlex
- W2649130454
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Keywords
- research methods course, teacher perceptions, course design, psychology education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
